Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 22;52(15):3472–3483. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000131

Table 3.

Estimates from the IPD meta-analyses for each model's cut-off maximizing combined sensitivity and specificity

Outcome Threshold TP FP TN FN Pooled Sensitivity Pooled Specificity Combined Sensitivity Specificity Measures of heterogeneity
τ2 (Sensitivity) τ2 (Specificity) R (Sensitivity) R (Specificity)
Sum score 10.00 554 607 3279 102 0.88
(0.81; 0.93)
0.85
(0.81; 0.88)
1.73 1.08 0.31 2.59 2.81
Single factor from unidimensional model 0.58 560 645 3241 96 0.90
(0.83; 0.94)
0.84
(0.80; 0.87)
1.73 1.11 0.33 2.61 2.92
Cognitive-affective factor from two-dimensional model 0.58 567 644 3242 89 0.91
(0.84; 0.94)
0.84
(0.80; 0.87)
1.74 1.04 0.30 2.55 2.82
General factor from bi-factor model 0.57 569 668 3218 87 0.91
(0.85; 0.94)
0.83
(0.80; 0.86)
1.74 1.02 0.30 2.51 2.83

TP = true positives, FP = false positives, TN = true negatives, FN = false negatives, τ2 = tau squared.