Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ecol Indic. 2022 Aug;141:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109131

Table 6.

Comparison of responsiveness between the diatom MMIs developed for the East, Plains, and West regions in this study, and existing NRSA and NLA MMIs within each of the three regions. Performance is based on the responsiveness of the MMI using t-scores to compare mean values between least-disturbed (LD) and most-disturbed (MD) sites; the higher the t-score, the greater the MMI responsiveness. Note, the range of t-scores represents the minimum and maximum t-scores associated with each component ecoregion for a given region, wsshile a single t-score represents all sites across all ecoregions for a region.

RESPONSIVENESS (t-score between mean LD & MD sites)

MMI Type
River and Stream Diatoms
Stream Macroinvertebrates Stream Fish Lake Macroinvertebrates Lake Zooplankton
Region
East 18 10.1–14.7 7.7–15.4 7.3–8.5 4.9–5.8
Plains 9.6 5.7–9.7 5.9–9.8 6.0 4.5
West 8.5 14.7–15.7 7.6–8.7 9.4 6.3