Table 2.
Animal | Variable | The Six Geopolitical Zones in Nigeria | Total Nationwide | National Prevalence % | Odd Ratio | 95% CL | Z Statistics | p-Value | Number of Publications | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | NE | NW | SE | SS | SW | |||||||||
Cattle | Sample screened | 3213 | 5253 | 19,648 | 1567 | 369 | 12,458 | 42,508 | 12.2% | 0.1390 |
0.1346
to 0.1435 |
120.853 | <0.0001 | 43 |
+ ve samples | 277 | 1154 | 2617 | 51 | 151 | 937 | 5187 | |||||||
Regional prevalence | 8.6% | 22% | 13.3% | 3.3% | 40.9% | 7.5% | ||||||||
Donkey | Sample screened | 0 | 2101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2101 | 10.2% | 0.2427 | 0.2046 to 0.2879 | 16.247 | <0.0001 | 4 |
+ ve samples | 0 | 215 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 215 | |||||||
Regional prevalence | 0% | 10.2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||||
Camel | Sample screened | 0 | 1267 | 1192 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2459 | 20.9% | 0.2024 | 0.1796 to 0.2281 | 26.196 | <0.0001 | 5 |
+ ve samples | 0 | 398 | 116 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 514 | |||||||
Regional prevalence | 0% | 31.4% | 9.7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||||
Horse | Sample screened | 86 | 100 | 400 | 402 | 0 | 0 | 988 | 10.7% | 0.0941 | 0.0729 to 0.1214 | 18.190 | <0.0001 | 8 |
+ ve samples | 24 | 16 | 54 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 106 | |||||||
Regional prevalence | 27.9% | 16% | 13.5% | 3% | 0% | 0% | ||||||||
Goat | Sample screened | 2134 | 831 | 2191 | 340 | 0 | 2813 | 8309 | 10.2% | 0.1013 | 0.0931 to 0.1102 | 53.357 | <0.0001 | 20 |
+ ve samples | 410 | 75 | 303 | 12 | 0 | 46 | 846 | |||||||
Regional prevalence | 19.2% | 9% | 13.8% | 3.5% | 0% | 1.6% | ||||||||
Sheep | Sample screened | 1308 | 57 | 2449 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 3908 | 23.3% | 0.2831 | 0.2569 to 0.3119 | 25.465 | <0.0001 | 22 |
+ ve samples | 322 | 14 | 562 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 912 | |||||||
Regional prevalence | 24.6% | 24.6% | 22.9% | 0% | 0% | 14.9% | ||||||||
Pig | Sample screened | 369 | 0 | 0 | 351 | 55 | 200 | 975 | 18.7% | 0.1731 | 0.1420 to 0.2110 | 17.371 | <0.0001 | 5 |
+ ve samples | 125 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 55 | 0 | 182 | |||||||
Regional prevalence | 34% | 0% | 0% | 0.6% | 100% | 0% | ||||||||
Chicken | Sample screened | 275 | 730 | 0 | 410 | 0 | 140 | 1555 | 8.4% | 0.0298 | 0.0213 to 0.0417 | 20.498 | <0.0001 | 3 |
+ ve samples | 10 | 18 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 5 | 47 | |||||||
Regional prevalence | 3.6% | 2.5% | 0% | 3.4% | 0% | 3.6% | ||||||||
Dog | Sample screened | 492 | 374 | 200 | 123 | 0 | 1102 | 2291 | 19.4% | 0.2337 | 0.2037 to 0.2680 | 20.767 | <0.0001 | 8 |
+ ve samples | 115 | 76 | 43 | 34 | 0 | 176 | 444 | |||||||
Regional prevalence | 23.4% | 20.3% | 21.5% | 27.6% | 0% | 16% |
NC: North-Central, NE: North-East, NW: North-West, SE: South-East, SS: South-South, SW: South-West.