Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 22;37(5):323–330. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000664

TABLE 3.

Scan Length and Dose Estimates

Scanner 1 (Aquilion 64) Scanner 2 (Revolution CT) Scanner 3 (SOMATOM Force) All Scanners
Study cohort n=297 n=152 n=46 n=495
 Original scan length (cm) 27.1±3.0b 26.4±2.9 25.6±3.3b 26.8±3.0
 Reduced scan length (cm) 14.5±2.5ab 13.1±2.3a 12.4±2.2b 13.9±2.6
 Delta scan length (%) −46.3±8.2ab −50.3±8.7a −51.3±8.5b −48.0±8.6
 Original CTDI (mGy) 21.3±8.8ab 3.6±2.2ac 5.5±3.3bc 14.4±11.0
 Original DLP (mGy*cm) 473.1±236.9ab 121.0±77.1ac 179.6±106.5bc 338.0±253.5
 Original effective dose (mSv) 6.9±3.5ab 1.8±1.1ac 2.6±1.6bc 4.9±3.7
Random sample n=10 n=10 n=10 n=30
 Delta ∑mA (%) −48.4±13.8 −58.7±9.3 −61.7±17.3 −56.3±14.6
Prescan dose estimates n=10 n=10 n=20
 Delta scan length (%) −44.1±4.7 −47.0±3.6 −45.5±4.3
 Delta CTDI (%) −6.2±23.0 −24.4±8.5 −15.3±19.3
 Delta DLP (%) −45.6±8.4 −50.6±9.9 −48.1±9.3

Numbers are mean±SD. All parameters from the helical scan only (ie, without topogram or bolus tracking).

Prescan dose estimates were calculated on topograms of 20 different patients (not part of the main study cohort). In the study cohort, Games-Howell post-hoc analysis revealed significant differences between scanners 1 and 2 (a), 1 and 3 (b), and 2 and 3 (c).

∑mA indicates sum of mA extracted per slice over the respective scan range (this estimate takes dose modulation into account, but not overranging) calculated in a subset of the main study cohort (random sample).