Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 10;15(9):1705–1712. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac073

Table 4.

Association between TyG, triglycerides and fasting glucose to 4-point MACE in patients with CKD (n = 1142)

Unadjusted MACE 4-pt Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
TyG (per unit increase) 1.95 (1.11–3.40) 0.018 2.14 (1.18–3.90) 0.012 2.01 (1.09–3.70) 0.025 1.94 (1.01–3.73) 0.046
TyG ≥ 8.63 (median value) 2.29 (1.24–4.20) 0.008 2.22 (1.21–4.09) 0.010 2.09 (1.13–3.88) 0.019 2.54 (1.27–5.07) 0.008
Glucose (per mg/dL) 1.02 (1.00–1.05) 0.048 1.02 (0.99–1.04) 0.246 1.01 (0.99–1.04) 0.308 1.01 (0.98–1.03) 0.608
Triglycerides (per mg/dL) 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.099 1.00 (1.00–1.01) 0.021 1.00 (1.00–1.01) 0.040 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.143

The association of each parameter [TyG (per unit increase), TyG (≥8.63), glucose and triglycerides] to 4-point MACE is assessed separately in three different adjusted models.

TyG: triglycerides–glucose index; HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval. TyG = Ln (TG [mg/dL] × glucose [mg/dL]/2).

aModel 1: Cox regression adjusted for age and gender.

bModel 2: Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, hypertension and dyslipidemia.

cModel 3. Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, hypertension and atherosclerotic score.