Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 30;9(8):ofac393. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac393

Table 5.

Diagnostic Test Evaluation of 96 FN Episodes With mNGS Results

Test system Infection present/Statistics Infection not present/Value Total/95% CI
mNGS positive 26 5 31
mNGS negative 39 26 65
BC positive 12 1 13
BC negative 53 30 83
mNGS
Sensitivity 40.0% 28.0% to 52.9%
Specificity 83.9% 66.3% to 94.6%
Positive Likelihood Ratio 2.5 1.1 to 5.8
Negative Likelihood Ratio 0.7 0.6 to 0.9
Disease prevalence 67.7% 57.4% to 76.9%
Positive Predictive Value 83.9% 68.8% to 92.5%
Negative Predictive Value 40.0% 34.1% to 46.2%
Accuracy 54.2% 43.7% to 64.4%
Blood culture
Sensitivity 18.5% 9.9% to 30.0%
Specificity 96.8% 83.3% to 99.9%
Positive Likelihood Ratio 5.7 0.8 to 42.1
Negative Likelihood Ratio 0.8 0.7 to 0.1
Disease prevalence 67.7% 57.4% to 76.9%
Positive Predictive Value 92.3% 62.0% to 98.9%
Negative Predictive Value 36.1% 33.2% to 39.3%
Accuracy 43.8% 33.6% to 54.3%

Abbreviations: BC, blood culture; CI, confidence interval; FN, febrile neutropenia; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing.

NOTE: Viruses were excluded in the assessment of mNGS. One FN episode with negative mNGS and BC could not be adjudicated by the Infectious Diseases review panel, and 1 FN episode with a polymicrobial BC finding could not be successfully analyzed by mNGS.