Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 23;104:104400. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104400

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a. Mediation model for advocacy for equality attitudes at T3.

Note. We used the PROCESS macro in SPSS (Hayes, 2017) to test our indirect effects model with 10,000 bootstrapped samples. This analysis control for individual differences (personal income, education, age, race/ethnicity, gender, and political orientation) as well as participants' “baseline” level of external attributions for inequality for path x to m and “baseline” level of attitudinal advocacy for equality for path m to y.

b. Mediation model for advocacy for equality behavior at T3.

Note. We used the PROCESS macro in SPSS (Hayes, 2017) to test our indirect effects model with 10,000 bootstrapped samples. This analysis control for individual differences (personal income, education, age, race/ethnicity, gender, and political orientation) as well as participants' “baseline” level of external attributions for inequality for path x to m. We cannot control for participants “baseline” level of behavioral advocacy for equality because we did not measure it at Time 1.