Table 1.
Previous study on the mathematical models applied to SFE with a co-solvent for plants.
| Plant | Co-solvent | Mathematical model | Results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sumac seeds | Ethanol | Differential mass balances and shrinking core model (SC) | Both mathematical models can well predict the behaviour of the process and fit the data | 22 |
| Leaves and stems of Synadenium grantii | Ethanol | First order empirical model | The model fit with the experimental curve | 11 |
| Castanea sativa | Ethanol | Empirical model23, logistic model24, desoprtion model25, and broken and intact cell model (BIC)26 | The BIC model was the most fitted with the extraction curve followed by the logistic and desoprtion model. The empirical model was the least fitted | 27 |
| Cannabis hybrid flower | Ethanol | Broken and intact cell model (BIC) model26 | The model fit with the experimental curve | 28 |
| Eremanthus erythropappus | Ethanol | Broken and intact cell model (BIC) model26 | The model fit with the experimental curve | 29 |
| Spirulina platensis |
Ethanol Water Ethanol–water |
Differential mass balance model | The model fit with the experimental curve | 30 |
| Hypericum caprifoliatum |
Ethanol Water Ethanol–water |
Simplified broken and intact cell model (BIC) model31, differential mass balance model32 and desorption model25 | The differential mass balance model was the most fitted with the extraction curve | 33 |
| Phyllanthus niruri | Ethanol–water | Modified Sovová model34 | The model fit with the experimental curve | 17 |