Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ther. 2022 Mar 14;53(5):900–912. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.03.001

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Experts’ mean complexity ratings by intervention.

Note: N = 3 experts independently rated each intervention (possible scores = 10 – 30). Experts’ ratings were averaged to produce the total scores shown here. Planned contrasts indicated PRT was rated significantly more complex than DTT and VS, t(3.2) = 6.43, p = 0.006.

* For PRT, the standard error of the mean was zero resulting in upper and lower 95% confidence bounds equal to the mean.