Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ther. 2022 Mar 14;53(5):900–912. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.03.001

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations for all study variables (N = 65 schools).

Bivariate Correlations (r)
Variable M SD PRT fidelity DTT fidelity VS fidelity
Outcomes
 Fidelity to Pivotal Response Training (0–4) 2.11 0.98
 Fidelity to Discrete Trial Training (0–4) 2.30 1.10 0.48
 Fidelity to Visual Schedules (0–4) 1.62 0.96 0.43 0.44
Primary Antecedents
 School EBP Implementation Climate (0–4) 1.96 0.62 0.32 0.16 0.00
 Principal EBP Implementation Leadership (0–4) 2.50 0.72 0.27 0.03 −0.06
Control variables
 Principal Transformational Leadership (0–4) 2.38 0.70 0.26 0.30 0.27
 Northwest Region (ref = Northeast Region) 0.26 0.44 −0.09 0.21 0.08
 School Size (N of students) 585.29 198.89 0.01 −0.02 −0.15
% of Students - African American 40.67 33.13 0.03 −0.23 −0.10
% of Students - Hispanic 16.78 17.73 0.18 0.30 0.24
 % of Students - Asian 8.31 10.74 −0.13 0.02 −0.10
 % of Students - Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0.17 0.31 0.13 0.24 0.08
 % of Students - American Indian or Alaskan Native 0.22 0.24 0.23 0.13 0.01
 % of Students - Other Race 9.13 3.36 −0.07 0.05 0.04
 % of Students Receiving Free/Reduced Lunch 78.27 31.61 0.05 −0.10 0.02
 % of Students with Individualized Education Plan 14.38 5.25 −0.12 0.05 0.20

Note: Correlations greater than r = 0.24 and less than r = −0.24 are statistically significant at p < .05, two-tailed. EBP = evidence-based practice; DTT = discrete trial training; PRT = pivotal response training; VS = visual schedules.