Skip to main content
editorial
. 2022 Aug;11(4):592–596. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-22-143

Table 1. Results of Phase 3 HIMALAYA trial: efficacy outcome.

Efficacy outcome HIMALAYA trial
STRIDE (D + T300) (n=393) Durvalumab (n=389) Sorafenib (n=389)
Median follow-up, months 33.2 32.6 32.2
Median OS, months (95% CI) 16.4 (14.2–19.6) 16.6 (14.1–19.1) 13.8 (12.3–16.1)
OS HR (96.02% CI) 0.78 (0.65–0.93) 0.86 (0.73–1.03)
P value 0.0035 0.0674
Median PFS, months (95% CI) 3.8 (3.7–5.3) 3.7 (3.2–3.8) 4.1 (3.8–5.5)
PFS HR (95% CI) 0.90 (0.77–1.05) 1.02 (0.88–1.19)
ORR, % 20.1 17.0 5.1
CR, n (%) 12 (3.1) 6 (1.5) 0
PR, n (%) 67 (17.0) 60 (15.4) 20 (5.1)
SD, n (%) 157 (39.9) 147 (37.8) 216 (55.5)
PD, n (%) 157 (39.9) 176 (45.2) 153 (39.3)
DCR, n (%) 236 (60.1) 213 (54.8) 236 (60.7)
Median DOR, months (IQR) 22.34 (8.54–NR) 16.82 (7.43–NR) 18.43 (6.51–25.99)
Median TTR, months (95% CI) 2.17 (1.84–3.98) 2.09 (1.87–3.98) 3.78 (1.89–8.44)
Remaining in response, months
   6 82.3 81.8 78.9
   12 65.8 57.8 63.2

STRIDE, Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab; D + T300, durvalumab plus high dose tremelimumab; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; PFS, progression free survival; ORR, objective response rate; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response; NR, not reached; TTR, time to response.