Study | Simeone et al. (2017) | Tofighi et al. (2019) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study team member | M.D. | A.G. | M.D. | A.G. | |
Selection bias | Participants representative of target population | Somewhat likely | Somewhat likely | Very likely | Very likely |
Percent of selected individuals who agreed to participate | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
Section rating | Moderate | Moderate | Strong | Strong | |
Study design | Indicate the study design | Retrospective electronic medical record review | Retrospective electronic medical record review | Survey | Survey |
Study described as randomized | No | No | No | No | |
Was randomized method described | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
Was randomized method appropriate | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
Section rating | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | |
Confounders | Important differences between groups pre-intervention | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Indicate % of confounders controlled | Yes | Yes | Can’t tell | Can’t tell | |
Section rating | Strong | Strong | Weak | Weak | |
Blinding | Outcome assessors aware of intervention or exposure status of participants | N/A | N/A | Can’t tell | Can’t tell |
Participants aware of research question | N/A | N/A | Can’t tell | Can’t tell | |
Section rating | N/A | N/A | Moderate | Moderate | |
Data collection | Data collection methods valid | Yes | Yes | Can’t tell | Can’t tell |
Data collection tools reliable | Yes | Yes | Can’t tell | Can’t tell | |
Section rating | Strong | Strong | Weak | Weak | |
Withdrawals and dropouts | Withdrawals and dropouts reported in #s/reasons per groups | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
% of participants completing the study | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
Section rating | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
Final score | Discrepancy between reviewers (Y/N) | N | N | N | N |
Reason for discrepancy | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
Final global rating | Moderate | Moderate | Weak | Weak |
Note. EPHPP = Effective Public Health Practice Project; SU = substance use.