Table 3.
Barriers and facilitators for RTW in the early phase (≤ 6 months) postinjury.
Factors | Authors | Categories of interest | Barriers for RTW* | Facilitators for RTW* | Statistical reported | Levels of evidence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biological factors (n = 7) | ||||||
Injury severity | Izadi et al. (35) | Modified hand injury severity scale | 11.45 (6.88–16.02) | Coef (95% CI) | Strong | |
Roesler et al. (47) | Modified hand injury severity scale | 1.66 | OR | |||
Kendrick et al. (36) | Abbreviated injury scale | 0.79 (0.68–0.92) | RR (95% CI) | |||
Lilley et al. (41) | Hospital admission for injury | 2.10 (1.66–2.64) | OR (95% CI) | |||
Clay et al. (24) | Isolated vs. Mutiple injury | 2.80 (1.10–6.97) | OR (95% CI) | |||
Clay et al. (25) | Injury Severity Scores > 9 | 0.63 (0.39–0.99) | RRR (95% CI) | |||
Disability post-injury | Marom et al. (44) | WHO-DAS II | 0.96 (0.93–0.99) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | |
Izadi et al. (35) | Work DASH | 0.60 (0.32–0.88) | Coef (95% CI) | |||
Other factors | ||||||
Kendrick et al. (36) | Male vs. female | 1.94 (1.34–2.82) | RR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Lilley et al. (41) | BMI (Obese vs. normal) | 1.48 (1.13–1.94) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Clay et al. (25) | Increasing age | 0.98 (0.96–0.99) | RRR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Clay et al. (25) | McGill Pain Questionnaire | 0.47 (0.27–0.82) | RRR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Clay et al. (25) | Initial need for surgery | 0.61 (0.39–0.96) | RRR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Psychological factors (n = 6) | ||||||
Other factors | Roesler et al. (47) | Positive and negative affect scale | 1.14 | OR | Limited | |
Roesler et al. (47) | Health locus of control | 5.11 | OR | Limited | ||
Lilley et al. (41) | Prior depressive episode | 1.27 (1.02–1.59) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Hou et al. (33) | Psychological subscale | 1.15 (1.01–1.30) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Clay et al. (25) | Negative pain attitudes | 0.49 (0.31–0.77) | RRR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Clay et al. (26) | Recovery belief, strong | 16.73 (3.59–77.88) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Social factors (n = 20) | ||||||
Education | Marom et al. (44) | Education ≥ 12 years | 3.44 (1.35–8.73) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | |
Kong et al. (40) | Secondary vs. primary school | 2.5 (1.3–4.9) | HR(95% CI) | |||
Clay et al. (26) | University | 6.27 (1.72–22.9) | OR (95% CI) | |||
Blue-collar work | Lilley et al. (41) | Blue-collar vs. white-collar | 1.52 (1.14–2.02) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | |
Clay et al. (25) | Blue-collar vs. white-collar | 0.52 (0.32–0.84) | RRR (95% CI) | |||
Other factors | Marom et al. (44) | Use of legal counsel (yes) | 0.45 (0.20–1.00) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | |
Izadi et al. (35) | Smoker | 7.91 (1.41–14.41) | Coef (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Izadi et al. (35) | Job title | Coef (95% CI) | Limited | |||
Roesler et al. (47) | Number of people in houshold | 0.015 | OR | Limited | ||
Kendrick et al. (36) | Injured at work (yes vs. no) | 0.49 (0.27–0.87) | RR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Lilley et al. (41) | Temporary vs. permanent contract | 1.89 (1.27–2.81) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Kendrick et al. (36) | Self employed vs. paid employment | 1.15 (1.03–1.30) | RR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Lilley et al. (41) | 6–7 vs. 5 days | 1.54 (1.21–1.96) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Lilley et al. (41) | Physial work | 1.93 (1.38–2.72) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Kendrick et al. (36) | Living in deprived areas | 0.59 (0.40–0.85) | RR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Lilley et al. (41) | Income (<30.000 vs. >5000 USD) | 1.81 (1.33–2.48) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Lilley et al. (41) | Financial security (insecure) | 1.55 (1.22–1.96) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Lilley et al. (41) | Exercise (7 days vs. ≤ 4 days) | 0.67 (0.54–0.83) | OR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Kong et al. (40) | Family's attituted to RTW | 4.0 (1.4–11) | HR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Kong et al. (40) | Perception of social support | 1.9 (1.2–3.0) | HR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Kong et al. (40) | Computer skill training (yes) | 1.5 (1.1–2.1) | HR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Clay et al. (25) | Social functioning (SF36) | 1.89 (1.17–3.07) | RRR (95% CI) | Limited | ||
Clay et al. (26) | Received compensation | 0.23 (0.09–0.61) | OR (95% CI) | Limited |
RTW, Return to work; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; Coef, coefficient; HR, Hazard ratio; RRR, relative rate ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Barriers or facilitators for RTW were reported in positive or negative direction depending on the definition of outcome, or the categories of interest, or the statistical reported.
Studies with a low risk of bias and high-quality were bolded.