Table 4.
Use of implementation resources by survey respondents who had and had not adopted the STAT model.
| Implementers (n = 40) | Non-implementers(n = 29) |
Total (n = 73)# |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Face-to-face training workshops [n(%)] |
|||
| High value | 35 (88) | 11 (38) | 49 (67) |
| Moderate value | 3 (7.5) | 15 (52) | 19 (26) |
| No value/not used | 2 (5.0) | 3 (10) | 5 (7) |
| Community of practice [n(%)] | |||
| High value | 5 (13) | 5 (17) | 11 (15) |
| Moderate value | 16 (40) | 9 (31) | 27 (37) |
| No value/not used | 19 (48) | 15 (52) | 35 (48) |
| Handbook [n(%)] | |||
| High value | 30 (75) | 13 (45) | 46 (63) |
| Moderate value | 7 (18) | 12 (41) | 20 (27) |
| No value/not used | 3 (8) | 4 (14) | 7 (10) |
| Consultations [n(%)] | |||
| High value | 14 (35) | 3 (10) | 19 (26) |
| Moderate value | 10 (25) | 7 (24) | 18 (25) |
| No value/not used | 16 (40) | 19 (66) | 36 (49) |
| Publications [n(%)] | |||
| High value | 13 (33) | 3 (10) | 17 (23) |
| Moderate value | 11 (28) | 10 (35) | 22 (30) |
| No value/not used | 16 (40) | 16 (55) | 34 (47) |
No information regarding adoption provided by 4 survey respondents.