Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 24;28(12):1578–1590. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.013

Table 7.

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence profile for population, intervention, comparison, outcome 22: Tixagevimab-cilgavimab for mild or moderate coronavirus disease 2019

People: Patients with mild or moderate COVID-19
Settings: Ambulatory patients
Intervention: Tixagevimab-cilgavimab at 300 mg + 300 mg administered via intramuscular injections
Comparison: No treatment
Outcomes
Absolute effect
Relative effect (95% CI)
Number of studies
Certainty of the evidence (GRADE)
With tixagevimab-cilgavimab Without tixagevimab-cilgavimab
All-cause mortality (within 29 d from treatment) 6/452 (1%) 6/451 (1%) RR: 1.00 (0.32–3.06) 1 [60] (903 patients) ⊕⊕⊖⊖
Low (due to very serious imprecision)
Difference: 0 fewer per 1000 (95% CI: −61 to 60)
Hospitalisation (within 29 d from treatment) 18/407 (4%) 37/415 (9%) RR: 0.49 (0.28–0.85) 1 [60] (822 patients) ⊕⊕⊕⊖
Moderate (due to serious imprecision)
Difference: 22 fewer per 1000 (95% CI: −12 to −91)
Adverse events (end of follow-up) 132/452 (29%) 163/451 (36%) RR: 0.80 (0.66–0.97) 1 [60] (903 patients) ⊕⊕⊕⊖
Moderate (due to serious imprecision)
Difference: 14 fewer per 1000 (95% CI: −7 to −119)

COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; RR, risk ratio.