Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 16;2022:6013474. doi: 10.1155/2022/6013474

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics.

Study G N Paroxysmal AF(%) Mean age (years) Male (%) Hypertension (%) Diabetes (%) Previous Stroke/TIA (n,%) CHA2DS2‐VASc score, median LA volume /LA size LVEF(%) Recurrence during the follow-up period(%) complications
Nilsson et al. [19] HPSD +RFA 45 26 (57%) 55 ± 10 30 (66.7) 21 +NR NR NR NR NR 11 (24.4) 1 (one experienced transient cerebral ischaemic episode)
Conventional +RFA 45 32 (71%) 51 ± 11 36 (80) 20 NR NR NR NR NR 12 (26.7) 1 (one experienced transient cerebral ischaemic episode)

Baher et al. [23] HPSD +RFA 574 276 (46.8) 69.0 ± 11.8 385 (67.1) 369 (64.2) 112 (19.5) 81 (14.1) 2.9 ± 1.7 NR NR 241 (42.0) 82 (all had esophageal thermal injury)
Conventional +RFA 113 80 (70.8) 68.3 ± 11.6 67 (59.3) 68(60.1) 18(18.5) 7 (6.2) 2.5 ± 1.6 NR NR 46 (40.7) 16 (all had esophageal thermal injury)

Pambrun et al. [22] HPSD +RFA 50 50 (100) 65 ± 8.2 35 (70) 14 (28) 3 (6) 3 (6) NR 107.6 ± 23.1 ml 61.7 ± 5.6 5 (10.0) 2 (all had Groin hematoma)
Conventional +RFA 50 50 (100) 62.5 ± 10.6 30 (60) 12 (24) 3 (6) 3 (6) NR 102.9 ± 20.1 ml 61.1 ± 4.4 6 (12.0) 3 (all had Groin hematoma)

Bunch et al. [28] HPSD +RFA 402 190 (47.3) 67.1 ± 10.5 253(62.9) 358 (89.1) 126(31.1) 47 (11.7) NR NR 54.6 ± 12.1 15 5(38.6) 45 (Thirty-three patients dead and twelve patients with stroke)
Conventional +RFA 402 202 (50.2) 66.4 ± 12.2 262(65.2) 348 (86.6) 121(30.1) 51 (12.7) NR NR 54.7 ± 12.8 135(33.6) 40 (Thirty-one patients dead and nine patients with stroke)

Ejima et al. [17] HPSD +RFA 60 60 (100) 63.0 ± 11.3 44 (73.3) 29 (48.3) 10 (16.7) 6 (10.0) 1.8 34.3 ml/m2 57.7 ± 3.9 7 (11.7) 1 (all had phrenic nerve palsy)
Conventional +RFA 60 60 (100) 66.7 ± 8.9 42 (70.0) 30 (50.0) 12 (20.0) 7 (11.7) 2.2 36.1 ml/m2 57.4 ± 6.3 17 (28.3) 0

Kottmaier et al. [32] HPSD +RFA 97 97 (100) 60.8 ± 13.9 57 (58.8) 56 (57.7) NR 6 (6.2) 1.95 NR 57 ± 5 16 (16.5) 13 (Three patients with pericardial effusion and ten patients had groin complications)
Conventional +RFA 100 100 (100) 60.8 ± 10.5 60 (60.0) 58 (58.0) NR 7 (7.0) 1.64 NR 55 ± 9 35 (35.0) 17 (two patients with pericardial effusion and five patients with groin complications)

Kumagai et al.[24] HPSD +RFA 80 20 (25) 63.0 ± 9.1 60 (75) NR NR NR 0.7 ± 1.0 41.6 ± 5.1 mm 62.5 ± 7.7 11 (13.8) 0
Conventional +RFA 80 24 (30) 63.1 ± 9.1 66 (82.5) NR NR NR 0.8 ± 0.8 43.3 ± 6.4 mm 62.2 ± 7.2 19 (23.8) 0

Kyriakopoulou et al.[21] HPSD +RFA 80 80 (100) 67 47 (59) NR NR NR 2 43 ± 8 mm NR 20 (25.0) 0
Conventional +RFA 105 105 (100) 64 65 (62) NR NR NR 2 44 ± 6 mm NR 14 (13.3) 0

Yavin et al. [26] HPSD +RFA 112 76 (67.8) 62.3 ± 5.2 71 (63.3) 70 (62.5) 11 (9.8) NR 2.4 ± 1.3 44.2 ± 4.7 mm 60.3 ± 6.1 (n = 91) 23 (20.5) 1 (One patient with steam pop)
Conventional +RFA 112 67 (59.8) 64.8 ± 7.2 79 (70.5) 76 (67.8) 7 (6.2) NR 2.6 ± 1.4 47.1 ± 5.1 mm 57.8 ± 5.4 (n = 86) 34 (30.4) 2 (One patient with large pericardial effusion and one patient with right phrenic nerve paralysis)

Yazaki et al. [27] HPSD +RFA 32 22 (89) 61 ± 11 27 (84) NR NR NR NR 40 ± 13 ml/cm2 55 ± 7 9 (28.1) 1 (One patient with acute right phrenic nerve injury)
Conventional +RFA 32 20 (63) 66 ± 11 20 (63) NR NR NR NR 41 ± 14 ml/cm2 56 ± 7 11 (34.4) 0

Dikdan et al. [16] HPSD +RFA 76 32 (42.1) 63.20 54 (71.1) NR NR NR 2 145.4 ml (By CTA) 56.8 15 (19.7) NR
Conventional +RFA 51 21 (41.2) 60.70 40 (78.4) NR NR NR 1 162.3 m (By CTA) l 56.6 13 (25.5) NR

Chen et al. [18] HPSD +RFA 40 30 (75) 56.9 ± 10.6 26 (65.0) 10 (25.0) 2 (5.0) 0 (0) 2.1 ± 1.10 36.4 ± 4.30 mm 64.2 ± 6.9 7 (17.5) 2 (two patients with steam pop)
Conventional +RFA 40 25 (62.5) 56.70 ± 11.5 29 (72.5) 8 (20.0) 3 (7.5) 0 (0) 2.2 ± 1.00 36.4 ± 4.30 mm 66.4 ± 5.3 13 (32.5) 0

Hansom et al. [25] HPSD +RFA 107 67 (65) 62 ± 9 69 (65) 44 (41) 9 (8) 4 (4) 1.9 41 ± 0.7 mm NR 23 (21.5) 3 (One patient with vascular access issues, one patient with urosepsis and one patient with phrenic nerve palsy)
Conventional +RFA 107 60 (56) 62 ± 9 81 (76) 47 (44) 13 (12) 9 (8) 2.0 41 ± 0.6 mm NR 29 (27.1) 6 (two patients with vascular access issues, one patient with pericardial tamponade, two patients with urosepsis and one patient with gastroparesis)

O'Brien et al. [29] HPSD +RFA 88 39 (44.3) 64.5 57 (64.8) 35 (39.8) 6 (6.8) 9 (10.2) 2.0 40 mm NR 17 (19.3) 6 (One patient with pulmonary edema, three patients with chest pain, and two patients with femoral access site bleeds)
Conventional +RFA 93 60 (64.5) 64 64 (68.8) 37 (39.8) 8 (8.6) 8 (8.6) 1.0 39 mm NR 16 (17.2) 2 (One patient with chest pain, and one patient with transient dysphagia)

Park et al. [20] HPSD +RFA 315 180 (57.1) 59 ± 11 232 (73.7) 151 (47.9) 53 (16.8) 38 (12.1) 1.8 ± 1.6 42.8 ± 6.6 mm 63.2 ± 8.2 41 (13.0) 9
Conventional +RFA 945 553 (58.5) 59 ± 10 699 (74.0) 455 (48.1) 153 (16.2) 115 (12.2) 1.8 ± 1.5 42.5 ± 6.2 mm 61.5 ± 9.6 171 (18.1) 35

Vassallo et al. [31] HPSD +RFA 197 113 (66.5) 61.72 141 (71.6) 131 (66.5) 38 (19.3) 14 (7.1) 2.35 NR NR 32 (16.2) 0
Conventional +RFA 158 121 (76.58) 58.9 113 (71.5) 105 (66.5) 32 (20.3) 11 (7.0) 2.03 NR NR 64 (40.4) 0

Wielandts et al. [30] HPSD +RFA 48 48 (100) 64 ± 11 32 (66.7) NR NR NR 1 39 ± 7 mm NR 5 (10.4) 1 (all with esophageal lesions)
Conventional RFA 48 48 (100) 61 ± 11 33 (68.8) NR NR NR 1 40 ± 7 mm NR 4 (8.3) 1 (all with esophageal lesions)

G: group; +NR: no records; +RFA: radiofrequency ablation.