Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 18;49(11):3917–3928. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05787-9

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Box plots illustrating the relationship between imaging parameters and RPE ISUP grade. A PSMA SUVmax had a positive correlation to ISUP (r = 0.508, p < 0.001). B ADCmean a negative trend in correlation to ISUP (r =  − 0.192, p = 0.135) for all lesions. C A significant positive correlation for SUVmax with ISUP was confirmed for EXP growth (r = 0.415, p = 0.039) but not for INF growth (r = 0.284, p = 0.088). D For subdivided growth patterns, the ADCmean had no correlation to ISUP (p = 0.861 for EXP, and p = 0.982 for INF)