Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychother Res. 2022 Feb 24;32(8):972–983. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2022.2044086

Table 1.

Pearson Correlations of Hostile Resistance with Mediator/Moderator Variables.

Hostile Resistance, Session 2 Hostile Resistance, Session 10
Adherence, Session 2 < .01 −.18
Adherence, Session 10 −.11 −.25
Adherence, Session 2 (Curvilinear) −.02 −.19
Adherence, Session 10 (Curvilinear) −.12 −.21
Off-Protocol, Session 2 .07 −.01
Off-Protocol, Session 10 .15 −.06
Off-Protocol, Session 2 (Curvilinear) .06 −.01
Off-Protocol, Session 10 (Curvilinear) .17 −.05
Working Alliance-Client, Session 2 −.08 −.15
Working Alliance-Therapist, Session 2 −.17 .18
Working Alliance-Client, Session 10 Residualized −.58** −.36*
Working Alliance-Therapist, Session 10 Residualized −.41** −.32*

Note: The residualized working alliance score is the residual of regressing Session 10 alliance on the average of alliance scores from Sessions 2 and 5. As the absence and presence of hostile resistance was coded as 0 and 1, respectively, negative correlations indicate that levels of the mediator/moderator variable were lower in the hostilely resistant group.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.