Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychother Res. 2022 Feb 24;32(8):972–983. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2022.2044086

Table 2.

Mediators’ Prediction of Symptom Change after Session 10 (Hostile Resistance Not Included as a Covariate).

Mediator x Time Term n β SE t (df) p r CI 95%

Adherence 54 0.10 0.26 0.37 (87) .71 .05 −.22, .31
Adherence-Squared 54 −0.05 0.15 −0.34 (86) .74 −.05 −.31, .22
Off-Protocol 56 −0.98 1.00 −0.97 (92) .34 −.13 −.38, .14
Off-Protocol-Squared 56 1.67 3.03 0.55 (91) .58 .07 −.19, .33
Working Alliance-Client, Residualized 36 0.10 0.31 0.32 (62) .75 .05 −.28, .38
Working Alliance-Therapist, Residualized 52 0.22 0.26 0.85 (88) .40 .11 −.16, .38

Note: Results were generated using hierarchical linear modeling. All putative mediators were measured at Session 10 with the exception of the two working alliance variables, which are residualized change scores (i.e., residuals of regressing Session 10 alliance on the average of alliance scores from Sessions 2 and 5).