Table 3.
Mediation Results for the Association Between Hostile Resistance in Session 10 and Poor Subsequent Symptom Change.
Mediation Model | n | β | SE | t (df) | p | r | CI 95% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Adherence x Time Hostile Resistance x Time |
52 | 0.18 −1.91 |
0.27 0.89 |
0.71 (85) −2.13 (85) |
.48 .04 |
.01 −.29 |
−.18, .36 −.52, −.02 |
Adherence-Squared x Time Hostile Resistance x Time |
52 | −0.14 −2.11 |
0.16 0.93 |
−0.86 (84) −2.27 (84) |
.39 .03 |
−.12 −.31 |
−.38, .16 −.53, −.04 |
Off-Protocol x Time Hostile Resistance x Time |
53 | −0.74 −1.83 |
1.02 0.87 |
−0.72 (87) −2.11 (87) |
.47 .04 |
−.10 −.28 |
−.36, .17 −.51, −.01 |
Off-Protocol-Squared x Time Hostile Resistance x Time |
53 | 0.16 −1.84 |
3.12 0.89 |
0.05 (86) −2.08 (86) |
.96 .04 |
.01 −.28 |
−.26, .28 −.51, −.01 |
Working Alliance-Client x Time Hostile Resistance x Time |
31 | 0.22 −1.60 |
0.32 1.12 |
0.68 (51) −1.43 (51) |
.50 .16 |
.13 −.26 |
−.24, .46 −.11, .56 |
Working Alliance-Therapist x Time Hostile Resistance x Time |
46 | 0.24 −1.80 |
0.27 0.90 |
0.90 (77) −2.01 (77) |
.37 .048 |
.13 −.29 |
−.16, .41 < .001, .54 |
Note: Results were generated using hierarchical linear modeling. Mediation is suggested when the Mediator x Time term is significant and the Hostile Resistance x Time term is non-significant. Hostile resistance and all putative mediators were measured at Session 10 with the exception of the two working alliance variables, which are residualized change scores. In these analyses, a negative Hostile Resistance x Time effect indicates that hostile resistance predicts a slower rate of change on the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS); a negative Mediator x Time effect indicates that a higher level of that mediator predicts a faster rate of PDSS change.