Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 15;17:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.016

Table 3.

Handheld navigation and conventional component position, operative time, and fluoroscopy use.

Variable Direct anterior approach
P value
Handheld navigation (n = 99) Conventional fluoroscopy (n = 60)
Acetabular cup version
 Mean difference in degrees 3.2 (3.1) 5.8 (4.6) <.001b
 Outlier ≥5° 24 (24%) 29 (48%) .002b
 Outlier ≥10° 5 (5%) 12 (20%) .003b
Acetabular cup inclination
 Mean difference in degrees 1.8 (1.6) 5.4 (4.1) <.001b
 Outlier ≥5° 8 (8%) 25 (42%) <.001b
 Outlier ≥10° 0 (0%) 9 (15%) <.001b
Leg length discrepancy
 Mean difference in mm 1.6 (1.7) 3.4 (3.0) <.001b
 Outlier ≥5 mm 5 (5%) 18 (30%) <.001b
 Outlier ≥10 mm 0 (0%) 3 (5%) .052
Offset discrepancya
 Mean difference in mm 1.4 (1.7) 6.1 (4.5) <.001b
 Outlier ≥5 mm 3 (7%) 14 (61%) <.001b
 Outlier ≥10 mm 0 (0%) 3 (13%) .032b
Operative time (min) 75 (17) 72 (24) .305
Fluoroscopic dose (mGy) 1.01 (0.89) 2.08 (2.10) <.001b
Fluoroscopic time (s) 11.2 (8.8) 19.1 (8.4) <.001b

Categorical data presented as n (%); continuous data presented as mean (standard deviation).

a

Intraoperative offset measurement available in 47 navigation cases.

b

Statistically significant P value.