Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 10;13:920165. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.920165

TABLE 1.

Study characteristics.

Study Year Enrolled patient Design Tx arm (no. of patients) Tx line ORR DCR PFS, mos OS, mos
Reck 2019 Stage IV NS-NSCLC Phase 3 Randomized Atezo + PacCb (n = 402/)
Atezo + Bev + PacCb (n = 400)
Bev + PacCb (n = 400)
1/2 40.6%
56.4%
40.2%
NR 6.7 (NR)
8.4 (8.0–9.9)
6.8 (6.0–7.0)
19.5 (16.3–21.3)
19.8 (17.4–24.2)
14.9 (13.4–17.1)
Zhou 2020 Stage IIIb/IV NS-NSCLC Phase 1b/2
Single group
Cam + Apa (n = 105) ≥2 30.9% 73.3% 5.7 (4.5–8.8) 15.5 (10.9–24.5)
Herbst 2019 Stage IV NSCLC Phase 1a/b
Non-randomized
Pembro + Ram (n = 27) ≥2 30% 85% 9.7 (4.6–27.6) 26.2 (11.8–nr)
Herbst 2020 Stage III/IV NSCLC Phase 1
Non-randomized
Pembro + Ram (n = 26) 1 42.3% 84.6% 9.3 (4.0–nr) nr
Chu 2021 Stage III/IV NSCLC Phase 1
Non-randomized
Sinti + Anlo (n = 22) 1 77.3% 100% 15 (8.3–nr) nr
Seto 2020 Stage III/IV NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression Phase 2
Single group
Atezo + Bev (n = 39) 1 64.1% NR 15.9 (5.65–15.93) nr
Lee 2020 Stage IIIb/IV NS-NSCLC Phase 3
Randomized
Niv + Bev + PacCb (n = 275)
Placebo + Bev + PacCb (n = 275)
1 61.5% 50.5% NR 12.1 (9.8–14)
8.1 (7.0–8.5)
25.4 (21.8–nr)
24.7 (20.2–nr)
Taylor 2020 Stage III/IV NSCLC Phase 1b/2
Single group
Pembro + Lenva (n = 21) ≥1 33.3% 80.9% 5.9 (2.3–13.8) NR
Nishio 2020 Stage IV NS-NSCLC Phase 3 part 1 Randomized Double-blind Pembro + Lenva + PemCb/Cis (n = 13) 1 69.2% 92.3% NR NR
Bang 2020 Stage IIIb/IV NSCLC Phase 1a/b
Non-randomized
Durva + Ram (n = 28) ≥2 11% 57% 2.7 (1.6–5.8) 11 (6.2–15.2)
Ardeshir-Larijani 2021 Stage IIII NS-NSCLC Phase 2
Single group
Atezo + Bev + PemCb (n = 30) 1 35.71% 92.85% NR NR
Yang 2021 Stage IV NSCLC Phase 3
Randomized
Pembro + Lenva (n = 309)
Pembro + Placebo (n = 314)
1 40.5%
27.7%
NR 6.6 (6.1–8.2)
4.2 (4.1–6.2)
14.1 (11.4–19.0)
16.4 (12.6–20.6)
Ren 2022 Stage IIIb-IV NS-NSCLC Phase 1b/2
Single group (cohort 4)
Cam + Apa (n = 25) 1 40% 92% 9.6 (5.5–nr) nr
Han 2021 Stage IIIb-IV NS-NSCLC Phase 3
Randomized
Penpulimab + Anlo (n = 26) 1 57.1% 90.5% nr nr
Zhou 2019 Stage IIIb/IV NS-NSCLC Phase 1/2
Single group (cohort 1)
Cam + Apa (n = 96) ≥2 30.8% 82.4% 5.9 (5.5–10.3) nr
Neal 2021 Stage IV NSCLC Phase 1b
Single group
Atezo + cabozantinib (n = 30) ≥2 23% 83% NR nr
Leal 2021 Stage III-IV NS-NSCLC Phase 2
Single group
Nivo + sitravatinib (n = 68) ≥2 16% NR 6 15 (9.3–21.1)
Han 2021 Stage IIIb-IV NSCLC Phase 3
Randomized
TQ-B2450 (PD-L1)+Anlo (n = 68)
TQ-B2450 (PD-L1) (n = 33)
≥2 30.9%
3%
73.5% 54.6% 6.9 (5.3–12.4)
2.7 (1.4–4.7)
nr
nr
Lee 2022 Stage IIIb/IV NSCLC Phase 2
Single group (stages II)
Atezo + Bev (n = 24) ≥3 12.5% 87.5% 5.6 (4.1–7.1) 14 (10.7–17.4)
Gao 2021 EGFR-mutated NSCLC Phase 1b/2
Single group (cohort 2)
Cam + Apa (n = 40) ≥3 20% 62.5% 3.2 (1.5–6.4) nr
Gao 2022 Stage IIIb/IV non-central squamous NSCLC Phase 1b/2
Single group (cohort 3)
Cam + Apa (n = 25) ≥2 32% 84% 6.0 (3.6–8.3) 12.8 (6.4–nr)
Gadgeel 2018 Stage IIIb/IV NS-NSCLC Phase 1/2
Single group (cohort B)
Pembro + Bev + PacCb (n = 25) 1 56% 76% 7.1 (4.2–14.3) 16.7 (8.5–nr)
Lu 2021 Stage IIIb-IV EGFR-mutated advanced NS-NSCLC Phase 3
Randomized
Sinti + Bev + PemCs (n = 148)
Sinti + PemCs (n = 145)
PemCs (n = 151)
≥2 43.9%
33.1%
25.2%
NR
NR
NR
6.9 (6.0–9.3)
5.6 (4.7–6.9)
4.3 (4.1–5.4)
nr
nr
nr

Tx, treatment; NS, non-squamous; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; Atezo, atezolizumab; Bev, bevacizumab; PacCb, paclitaxel plus carboplatin; Cam, camrelizumab; Apa, apatinib; Pembro, pembrolizumab; Ram, ramucirumab; Sin, sintilimab; Anlo, anlotinib; Niv, nivolumab; Len, lenvatinib; PemCb, pemetrexed plus carboplatin; Durva, durvalumab; Cis, cisplatin; mos, months; ORR, objective response rate; DCR, disease control rate; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; NR, not reported; nr, not reached.