Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 10;13:828565. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.828565

TABLE 3.

Study design characteristics and outcomes of three clinical trials included in the analysis.

Author (Year)Country Study design/patient number Age Sex (male %) Intervention Mortality, OLT (N, %) Hepatotoxicity (N/Tot) AEs (N, %)
Keays et al. (1991) Prospective RCT involving 50 patients: 25 NAC vs. 25 control NAC I.V. 150 mg/kg →50 mg/kg + intensive care 13/25 NAC (52%) - 0
London Adult (>18 years) Control group dextrose 5% + intensive care 20/25 control group (80%)
Male 48%
Bateman et al. (2014) Double-blind, randomized study involving 222 patients NAC I.V. 0 13/101 Vomiting: 71/109
United Kingdom 110 standard Standard: 150 mg/kg→ 50 mg/kg→100 mg/kg (20–25 h) Standard vs. Standard vs. 39/108 shorter
112 shorter Shorter: 100 mg/kg → 200 mg/kg (12 h) 9/100 shorter 45/109 ondansetronVs. 65/108 placebo
Adult (>18 years) With or without I.V. ondansetron pre-treatment or placebo 16/100 ondansetron
Male 40% vs. 6/100 placebo Anaphylactoid reactions: 31 standard vs. 5 shorter
Morrison et al. (2019) Randomized study involving 24 patients 6: NAC alone 0 2/6 (NAC alone) Serious adverse events
United Kingdom Adult (>18 years) 6: NAC I.V. + calmangafodipir 2 mmol/kg vs. 2/6 (NAC alone)
Male 45% 6: NAC + calmangafodipir 5 mmol/kg 0/18 (NAC + calmangafodipir) vs.
6: NAC + calmangafodipir 10 mmol/kg 4/6 (NAC +calmangafodipir 2) vs.
2/6 (NAC + calmangafodipir 5) vs.
3/6 (NAC + calmangafodipir 10)

NAC, N-acetylcysteine; AE, adverse events; LT, liver transplantation; I.V., intravenous; DILI, drug-induced liver injury; NR, not reported.