Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 9;9(8):e36430. doi: 10.2196/36430

Table 1.

Results of phases 1 and 2 of the Center for eHealth Research road map in the development of the PETRA (Personalized Treatment by Real-time Assessment) application.

Theme Description
Problems clients and clinicians identified in the status quo of mental health treatment

Reliability or efficiency of current monitoring instruments
  • Often paper-and-pencil based and deemed less reliable and efficient

  • Often focus too much on symptoms and fail to take important contextual factors and strengths into account

  • Usually only administered 1 to 2 times per month; missing relevant information about clients’ daily lives throughout the day

  • Usually not person-specific enough to be directly relevant to clients


Insights
  • Limited insight into overall progress and treatment outcomes

  • Limited insight into the effects of treatment or lifestyle adaptations

  • Limited insight into the frequency and severity of symptoms and when they occur

  • Limited insight into triggers and relapse signals

  • Recall of well-being in between sessions is biased by current mood or otherwise difficult to recall for clients (recall bias)


Therapeutic alliance
  • Knowledge imbalance between client and clinician, weakening the therapeutic alliance

  • Current monitoring instruments are often not discussed in treatment, weakening the therapeutic alliance

  • Limited contact between client and clinician in between sessions

  • Client does not believe in the current treatment approach as the effects are not clearly visible

Perceived advantages of personalized electronic diaries

Reliability or efficiency
  • More reliable and efficient as assessments take place multiple times per day via smartphone and are less easily forgotten or ignored


Insight
  • Offers insights into progress, treatment effects, and the flow of symptoms throughout daily life, thereby increasing client self-management

  • Offers insights into contextual factors and personal strengths


Therapeutic alliance
  • Client and clinicians share the same information and can, therefore, collaborate more easily

  • Relevant diary feedback can more easily be integrated in treatment, strengthening the therapeutic alliance and clients’ trust in their clinician

Perceived challenges in constructing personalized electronic diaries

Diary construction
  • What kind of clinical questions can be answered with electronic diaries?

  • How to formulate or select relevant and valid diary items?

  • How to determine the number of assessments per day, balancing client burden and the number needed to answer a clinical question?

  • How to determine the necessary diary schedule (eg, time-contingent or event-contingent) for a clinical question?

  • How to make sure the diary maximizes its advantages and minimizes disadvantages?


Diary feedback
  • How to automatically analyze and visualize the diary data without the need for statistical knowledge of the clinician?

  • How to interpret the diary feedback in a clinical context?