Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 21;2(8):1839–1847. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.2c00156

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(Space quantized) O2 sticking probabilities on Cu3Au(110)-(4 × 1). (a) LEED patterns for a clean Cu3Au(110)-(4 × 1). (b) Schematic depiction of Cu3Au(110)-(4 × 1) (Cu, reddish balls; Au, yellowish balls). (c) Time evolution of the sticking probability for a space-quantized O2 impinging on Cu3Au(110)-(4 × 1) (at a surface temperature of ca. 310 K) with translational energy Et = 0.10 eV. Time t = 0 corresponds to the time the beam shutter is opened to allow the molecular beam to impinge on the surface. Following the control signal shown (topmost right panel), the direction of the defining magnetic field Inline graphic can be modulated to alternately produce helicopter-like (high signal) and cartwheel-like (low signal) rotating O2 that impinge on Cu3Au(110)-(4 × 1). Numerical fits to the corresponding sticking probability data points (using exponentially decaying functions extrapolated to t = 0) also shown to guide the eye. The values at t = 0 correspond to the initial sticking probabilities S0(H), S0(Cx), and S0(Cy).