Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 9;36:103149. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103149

Table 2.

Results of Friedman rm ANOVA, comparing the general trend of each test, and results of Wilcoxon test, comparing each assessment time-point. Results are reported for the entire sample (TOTAL), and then separated for left-hemisphere lesion (LEFT) and right-hemisphere lesion (RIGHT). For significative result of this last test r is reported, as a measure of the effect size. SD = Standard Deviation.

TOTAL
Test Time Mean score (SD) % of deficit p-value Friedman (p-value Wilcoxon)
Phonemic fluency Pre 25.83 (±10.55) 23.81 % χ2 = 7.045; P = 0.03
(pre vs. post Z = −0.773; P = 0.439)
(post vs. FU Z = −3.449; P = 0.001, r = −0.376)
(pre vs. FU Z = −1.501; P = 0.133)
Post 23.4 (±14.24) 33.33 %
FU 29 (±11.34) 14.29 %
Semantic fluency Pre 36.9 (±10.59) 19.05 % χ2 = 8.787;P = 0.012
(pre vs. post Z = −2.05;P = 0.04, r = −0.224)
(post vs. FU Z = −3.128;P = 0.002, r = −0.341)
(pre vs. FU Z = −0.147; P = 0.883)
Post 31.55 (±14.5) 26.19 %
FU 36.83 (±10.21) 11.9 %



LEFT
Phonemic fluency Pre 22.95 (±10.83) 33.33 % χ2 = 7.407;P = 0.025
(pre vs. post Z = −1.961;P = 0.049, r = −0.303)
(post vs. FU Z = −2.840;P = 0.001, r = −0.438)
(pre vs. FU Z = −0.112; P = 0.911)
Post 16.00 (±13.74) 57.14 %
FU 24.52 (±19.05) 19.05 %
Semantic fluency Pre 32.76 (±10.55) 28.57 % χ2 = 14.0;P = 0.001
(pre vs. post Z = −2.465;P = 0.014, r = −0.380)
(post vs. FU Z = −3.671;P < 0.001, r = −0.566)
(pre vs. FU Z = −0.081; P = 0.936)
Post 22.67 (±13.95) 52.38 %
FU 32.62 (±11.02) 23.81 %



RIGHT
Phonemic fluency Pre 28.71 (±9.67) 14.29 % χ2 = 4.289; P = 0.117
(pre vs. post Z = −1.421; P = 0.155)
(post vs. FU Z = −1.920; P = 0.055)
(pre vs. FU Z = −1.913; P = 0.056)
Post 30.81 (±10.56) 9.52 %
FU 33.48 (±12.06) 9.52 %
Semantic fluency Pre 41.05 (±9.09) 9.52 % χ2 = 0.481; P = 0.786
(pre vs. post Z = −0.070; P = 0.944)
(post vs. FU Z = −0.427; P = 0.669)
(pre vs. FU Z = −0.580; P = 0.562)
Post 40.43 (±8.41) 0 %
FU 41.05 (±7.41) 0 %