Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 24.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2019 Jul 24;130:104580. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.003

Table 3.

Associations between DEHP exposure and pubertal development.

Reference; Study confidence; N Outcome Effect estimatea Mean exposure (IQR) (ng/mL) Pubertal development timing effect estimate
∑DEHP
Childhood Exposure
Wolff et al. (2017) and Wolff et al. (2014); Medium; 1,141 Age at menarche (n=1,051)
Age at 1st breast stage 2
Age at 1st pubic hair stage 2
HR (95% CI) Median 142 μg/g creatinine 1.00 (0.94, 1.06)
1.01 (0.94, 1.09)
0.92 (0.85, 0.99)*
Mouritsen et al. (2013) ; Low; 84 Age at breast stage 2+
Age at pubic hair stage 2+
Medians in high vs. low exposure 115 (14–4,627) “no significant difference”
Prenatal Exposure
Watkins et al. (2014) ; Medium; 120 Menarche
Breast stage 2+
Pubic hair stage 2+
OR (95% CI) 0.24 μmol/L 1.89 (0.57,6.22)
0.66 (0.26,1.69)
2.15 (0.62,7.48)
Hart et al. (2013); Low; 121 Su et al. (2014); Low; 69 Age at menarche Tanner stage > 1 Correlation coefficient OR (95% CI) 4.3 (2.7–7.1) 47 mg/g creatinine −0.17, p = 0.07 Stage 2: 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) Stage 3: 1.00 (0.99, 1.01)
a

OR and hazard ratio (HR) < 1 indicate later pubertal development. Bolding of the effect estimate indicates evidence that suggests later onset of puberty, while grey shading indicates evidence that suggests earlier onset of puberty. NR = not reported; Q = quartile, y/n = yes/no

*

p < 0.05.