Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;47(2):160–165. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_1365_21

Table 3.

The prevalence of psychological distress using random effect model by subgroup analyses

Subgroup Category Number of studies Events/N Pooled prevalence (95% CI) Heterogeneity χ2 (P value)

I2 t
Screening instrument DASS-21 8 761/7165 15.0% (09.8% - 20.1%) 98.56 0.005 1182. 2
Others 13 3877/9025 43.0% (31.2% - 57.6%) 99.48 0.054 <.0001
Risk of bias (score 0-9) Low risk (7-9) 04 1002/3070 19.1% (14.4%-23.8%) 98.65 0.014
Moderate Risk (4-6) 15 3824/12570 32.3% (21.4%-43.1%) 99.69 0.045 29.65
High risk (0-3) 02 96/521 19.2% (18.0%-36.6%) 96.22 0.015 <.0001

DASS 21: Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21, CI: Confidence interval