Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 28;41(7):2100247. doi: 10.1002/minf.202100247

Table 2.

Average Performance of different models.

Methods

Features

Feature Reduction (%)

Accuracy (%)

ROC AUC (%)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

Data set 1

MCM

1024

0

82.60±0.77

91.01±0.17

93.11±0.23

73.44±0.42

FCM

950

7.2

76.22±1.51

82.45±0.53

77.01±0.59

72.63±0.70

SFM

1024

0

77.58±1.32

83.23±0.39

77.98±0.17

76.05±0.19

SVM

1024

0

78.05±1.21

84.23±1.10

77.03±1.10

79.47±0.24

Data set 2

MCM

1024

0

83.94±0.65

90.81±0.17

89.91±0.14

78.54±1.02

FCM

926

9.5

72.91±1.09

80.15±1.01

74.18±0.59

73.17±0.61

SFM

1024

0

73.48±1.29

81.35±1.12

73.98±0.15

74.68±1.20

SVM

1024

0

75.35±1.42

82.39±0.51

75.40±1.03

77.43±0.27

± value indicates the standard deviation.