Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 11;4(4):e1331–e1337. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.017

Table 2.

Comparison of Labral Width Using MRI and Intraoperative Measurement Modalities in Primary Hip Arthroscopy Cases

MRI
Measurement, mm
Intraoperative Measurement, mm Difference, mm P Value (Paired-Sample t Test)
All patients
 3-O’clock position 6.8 ± 1.1 7.2 ± 1.5 –0.40 ± 1.8 .101
 12-O’clock position 6.9 ± 1.3 7.8 ± 2.3 –0.90 ± 2.5 .008
 9-O’clock position 6.2 ± 0.9 7.3 ± 1.6 –1.1 ± 1.6 <.001
Male subgroup
 3-O’clock position 7.0 ± 1.2 7.3 ± 1.4 –0.26 ± 2.0 .512
 12-O’clock position 7.1 ± 1.4 8.0 ± 1.4 –0.85 ± 1.8 .026
 9-O’clock position 6.5 ± 0.9 7.6 ± 1.4 –1.0 ± 1.5 .001
Female subgroup
 3-O’clock position 6.6 ± 0.9 7.1 ± 1.6 –0.51 ± 1.7 .099
 12-O’clock position 6.7 ± 1.2 7.6 ± 2.8 –0.94 ± 3.0 .083
 9-O’clock position 5.9 ± 0.8 7.0 ± 1.7 –1.1 ± 1.7 .001

NOTE. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

Statistically significant (P < .05).