Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Infect. 2022 Feb 25;98(8):586–591. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2021-055361

Table 3 -.

Prediction modeling of rectal chlamydia or gonorrhea given self-reported anal sex with last sexual partner among cisgender men at community-based STI clinic in Los Angeles, November 2018 - February 2020 (N=13,476)

n Estimate 95% CI AUC
Chlamydia 9,944
  Sensitivity 0.60 (0.59, 0.61) --
  Specificity 0.58 (0.54, 0.62) --
Model 1 9,944 2.09 (1.78, 2.46) 0.59
Model 2 9,456 2.05 (1.72, 2.44) 0.60
Model 3 9,456 1.98 (1.67, 2.36) 0.61
Gonorrhea 9,913
  Sensitivity 0.59 (0.58, 0.60) --
  Specificity 0.51 (0.47, 0.55) --
Model 1 9,913 1.49 (1.26, 1.75) 0.55
Model 2 9,427 1.33 (1.12, 1.58) 0.57
Model 3 9,427 1.27 (1.06, 1.51) 0.60

Abbreviations. STI= sexually transmitted infection; CI= Confidence Interval; AUC= Area Under the Curve

Model 1: Crude model of self-reported anal sex with last partner on rectal Chlamydia/Gonorrhea respectively

Model 2: Model of self-reported anal sex with last partner on rectal Chlamydia/Gonorrhea respectively, adjusting for partner type

Model 3: Model of self-reported anal sex with last partner on rectal Chlamydia/Gonorrhea respectively, adjusting for partner type and age