Table 1.
Sources | Disease/Model | Applications | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Human EnMSCs | Patients with thin endometrium | Increased thickness of endometrium and regenerative capacity. | Non-invasive harvesting procedure, easy expansion in vitro, and no ethical considerations. | Unclear the fate and long-term efficiency. | [21] |
Human EnSCs | A woman with IUA | Increased endometrial thickness and pregnancy potential. | [22] | ||
Human EnSCs | The female BALB/c nude mice with the ovarian cancer | Inhibit the epithelial ovarian cancer. | [23] | ||
Human MenSCs | Infertile women with severe AS | Increased thickness of endometrium and pregnancies. | Non-invasive operation to the human body, easy to collect, and not involved in ethical issues. | Difficult preservation and high contamination rate. | [24] |
Human MenSCs | Infertile women with refractory IUA | No adverse reaction and increased the endometrial thickness, 41.7% pregnancy rate. | [25] | ||
Human MenSCs | The ESCs were wounded with mifepristone | In the treatment of endometrial injury: activated the AKT and p38 MAPK signaling pathways. | [26] | ||
Human MenSCs |
The ESCs were fibrosis with TGFβ. | Inhibited myofibroblast differentiation of ESCs: activated Hippo/TAZ signal. | [27] | ||
Human BMSCs | Human Asherman's syndrome (AS) and/or endometrial atrophy (EA) | Increased the volume and the thickness of endometrium, decreased intrauterine adhesion scores. | Sufficient sources; easy to obtain; great cell proliferation ability; no immune rejection. | Affected the psychology of both the donors and the recipients; Huge individual differences in the proliferation, survival, differentiation and paracrine capacity; Usually lead to infection after implantation. |
[28] |
Human bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMDSCs) | Human with refractory AS or EA | Increased menstrual flow and pregnancies. | [29] | ||
Rat BMSCs | Rat AS model | 70% conceived rate. | [30] | ||
Human bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMNCs) | Patients with AS | Improved pregnancies and live births: downregulated ΔNp63 expression. | [31] | ||
Human BMNCs | Women with AS | Restored endometrium. | [32] | ||
Human UC-MSCs | Patient with IUA | Ten of the 26 patients had become pregnant, and eight of them had delivered live babies. | Lower immunogenicity, higher proliferation and self-renewal ability; extensive sources, no ethical disputes, no harm to the donor when obtaining the cells. | Lack of large animal data; few clinical applications. | [33] |
Human UC-MSCs | Patients with IUA or cesarean scar diverticulum | Improved safety for poor healing after uterine injury. | [34] | ||
Human UC-MSCs | Rat AS model | Increased blood supply; inhibited fibration; and restored the fertility. | [35] | ||
Human ADSCs | Infertile women with severe AS | Increased menstrual flow and endometrial thickness, embryo transferred successfully. | Higher proliferative capacity and anti-aging ability; Greater secretion capacity; many obtaining ways and easy operation process; less limitation on ethics. | No standardized method for in vitro extraction; Activity decreases with age | [36] |
Rat ADSCs | Rat AS model | Decreased inflammation and fibrosis and increased vascular proliferation. | [37] | ||
Human perivascular stem cells (HPVSCs) | Mouse AS model | Ameliorated compromised uterine environments: facilitated HIF1α-dependent angiogenesis. | Relative higher purity; stronger osteogenic ability. | Harsh extraction conditions. | [38] |
Human amniotic epithelial cells (HAECs) | Mouse AS model | Increased the endometrium and the number of endometrial glands, reduced fibrosis, generated microvessels. | Rich sources; convenient obtaining condition; no ethical issues; low immunogenicity; no tumorigenicity | Little basic researches. | [39] |