Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep;12(9):4512–4528. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-33

Table 3. CI and P value analysis in the comparison experiment on dataset A.

Metrics 95% CI P value
MT DT Unet Unet++ DT vs. MT DT vs. Unet DT vs. Unet++
TPR (0.862, 0.881) (0.877, 0.895) (0.829, 0.859) (0.829, 0.859) 0.006 0.021 0.097
FPR (0.096, 0.138) (0.088, 0.121) (0.168, 0.290) (0.122, 0.194) 0.110 0.733 0.088
JI (0.786, 0.808) (0.803, 0.822) (0.730, 0.762) (0.747, 0.776) 0.070 1.681e-6 1.294e-6
DSC (0.872, 0.889) (0.884, 0.898) (0.823, 0.850) (0.839, 0.863) 0.070 1.681e-6 1.291e-6
AER (0.223, 0.268) (0.201, 0.237) (0.322, 0.448) (0.268, 0.342) 0.111 2.394e-6 9.843e-7
HE (45.940, 55.521) (34.961, 42.933) (48.914, 58.911) (77.870, 89.891) 0.005 0.001 6.929e-21
MAE (27.361, 32.040) (12.440, 16.572) (21.532, 27.671) (39.020, 46.621) 0.008 3.038e-5 8.201e-22

CI, confidence interval; MT, medical transformer; DT, dilated transformer; TPR, true-positive ratio; FPR, false-positive ratio; JI, Jaccard index; DSC, Dice similarity coefficient; AER, area error ratio; HE, Hausdorff error; MAE, mean absolute error.