Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 24;19(193):20220168. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0168

Table 4.

Summary of studies assessing the relationship between wingbeat frequency, amplitude and mechanical power output.

species method flight mode speed (m s−1) remarks source
pigeon Columba livia field data—GPS and accelerometer measurements level, ascending and descending flight, all while circling 10–18 as speed increased Usherwood et al. [6]
WBF—varied approx. U shaped
WBA—increased
at constant speed, as power increased
WBF—increased
WBA—decreased
ascending flight
WBF—increased
WBA—increased
accelerating flight
WBF—increased
WBA—increased
pigeon Columba livia platform—muscle force measurements and kinematic analysis with high-speed cameras ascending, level and descending 1.4–3.9 in different flight modes Tobalske & Biewener [30]
WBF—did not vary significantly
WBA—decreased during take-off and prior to landing
common starling Sturnus vulgaris wind tunnel—respirometry masks and kinematics analysis with high-speed cameras level flight 6–14 as speed increased Ward et al. [27]
WBF—increased (less significant)
WBA—increased (less significant)
power—increased
Eurasian tree sparrow Passer montanus experiments in flight chamber—kinematics analysis with high-speed cameras vertical flight as maximum load lifted Wang et al. [32]
WBF—no significant variation
WBF—no significant variation
barn swallow Hirundo rustica wind tunnel—energetic costs measured by DLW, and kinematics analysis is by video recordings level flight 8–11.5 as speed increased Schmidt-Wellenburg et al. [23]
WBF—varied as U shaped
as mass increased
WBF—increased
power—increased
blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus flight inside a custom-built box—kinematics analysis with high-speed cameras take-off 3.4 as wing loading increased McFarlane et al. [58]
WBF—decreased
WBA—did not vary
power—decreased
AR—increased
thrush nightingale Luscinia luscinia wind tunnel—PIV and kinematics analysis with high-speed cameras level flight 5–10 as speed increased Rosén et al. [25]
WBF—no significant variation
WBA—no significant variation
thrush nightingale Luscinia luscinia wind tunnel—wingbeat frequency measured using a shutter stroboscope and video recording level flight 5–16 as mass increased Pennycuick et al. [22]
WBF—increased
as speed increased
WBF—varied in U shape (less significantly)
zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata wind tunnel—kinematics analysis with high-speed cameras intermittent flap-bounding flight 0–14 as speed increased Tobalske et al. [59]
WBF—increased (less significant)
WBA—decreased (significantly)
zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata surgical procedures to measure flight muscle activity ? as power increased Bahlman et al. [60]
WBF—no significant effect
WBA—increased effectively
zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata wind tunnel—muscle in vivo pectoralis fascicle strain measurements, and kinematics by high-speed video recordings level flight 0–14 as speed increased Ellerby & Askew [20]
WBF—varied approx. U shaped
WBA—increased only at hovering
budgerigar Melopsittacus undulates wind tunnel—muscle in vivo pectoralis fascicle strain measurements, and kinematics by high-speed video recordings level flight 4–16 as speed increased Ellerby & Askew [20]
WBF—varied approx. U shaped
WBA—did not vary significantly
cockatiel Nymphicus hollandicus wind tunnel—in vivo pectoralis muscle length change measurements level flight 0–16 as speed increased Morris & Askew [61]
power—increased (approx. U shaped)
WBF—reduced (highest at the lower range)
cockatiel Nymphicus hollandicus wind tunnel—in vivo surgical procedures and kinematics analysis with high-speed cameras level flight 0–14 as speed increased Hedrick et al. [21]; Tobalske et al. [19]
WBF—reduced at lower speed and increased at higher speed (approx. U shaped)
power—varied (approx. U shaped)
Eurasian teal Anas crecca wind tunnel—wingbeat frequency measured using a shutter stroboscope and video recording level flight 5–16 as mass increased Pennycuick et al. [22]
WBF—increased
as speed increased
WBF—varied in U shape (less significantly)
black-legged kittiwake Rissa tridactyla wild study—kinematics and airspeed data of commuting flights measured using GPS and accelerometer devices flap–glide flight (predominantly flapping) 2–16 as speed increased Collins et al. [62]
WBF—no significant relationship
WBA—increased significantly (as proxy by body moving amplitude)
Harris's hawk Parabuteo unicinctus outdoor flight—accelerometery data and kinematic analysis using video recordings climbing flight as climb power increased Van Walsum et al. [13]
WBF—increased linearly with lesser variation
WBA—increased linearly with higher variation (as proxy by body moving amplitude)
common swift Apus apus wind tunnel—PIV and kinematics analysis with high-speed cameras level flight 8–9.2 as speed increased Henningsson et al. [63]
WBF—decreased
WBA—increased
ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris flight experiments in an airtight cube—varying air density treated with heliox hovering as power increased Chai & Dudley [64]
WBF—increased (less significant)
WBA—increased (significantly)
as air density decreased
power—increased
ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris flight experiments in an airtight cube—varying air density treated with helium hovering as power increased Chai & Dudley [65]
WBF—did not vary
WBA—increased (significantly)
as air density decreased
power—increased
ruby-throated hummingbird Archilochus colubris cubic testing arena—surgical procedures to measure flight muscle activity and kinematics analysis with high-speed cameras hovering as load lifted increased Mahalingam & Welch [66]
WBF—did not vary
WBA—increased (significantly)
as air density decreased
WBF—did not vary
WBA—increased (significantly)
rufous hummingbird Selasphorus rufus wind tunnel—kinematics analysis with high-speed cameras hovering and level flight 0–12 as speed increased Tobalske et al. [67]
WBF—did not vary
WBA—increased (approx. U shaped)