. 2022 Aug 10;8(8):e10152. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10152

Table 4.

Comparison of the present study with some recent methods selected from the literature for the determination of DA.

Samples	Methods	Sample preparation	LOD	LR	Time (min)	RSD %	Refs
Shellfish	ELISA	LLE	≥25 ng g⁻¹	25–500 ng g⁻¹	>120	≤4.12	[19]
mussels	HPLC/PCD	SPE	≥25 ng mL⁻¹	50–1500 ng mL⁻¹	>25	≤1.9	[23]
seawater	RRLC-MS/MS	SPE	≥0.02 ng mL⁻¹	0.1–10.0 ng mL⁻¹	>10	≤19.0	[24]
seawater	HPLC/DAD	MIPs-SPE	≥0.01 mg mL⁻¹	0–50 mg mL⁻¹	>15	≤5.0	[25]
Plasma	HPLC-MS/MS	LLE	≥0.16 ng mL⁻¹	0.16–16 ng mL⁻¹	>> 60	≤7.3	[17]
Urine	HPLC-MS/MS	LLE	≥7.8 ng mL⁻¹	7.8–1000 ng mL⁻¹	>> 15	≤11.4	[17]
urine	UHPLC/DAD	RP-IL-DLLME	≥0.03 ng mL⁻¹	0.1–10.0 ng mL⁻¹	<10	≤6.4	Present method

ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assa.

HPLC-PCD: high-performance liquid chromatography/post-column derivatization.

RRLC-MS/MS: rapid resolution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

HPLC-DAD: high-performance liquid chromatography/diode-array detector.

MIPs: Molecularly imprinted polymers.