Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 12;12(16):2054. doi: 10.3390/ani12162054

Table 1.

Specimens analysed in this study. FN = field number. Max identity = Maximum identity scores with deposited homologous sequences.

Species FN Sex Locality Max Identity
U. alluaudi Mocquard, 1894 GA 476 female Montagne d’Ambre 100% vs. KF160464
U. henkeli Böhme & Ibisch, 1990 GA 477 male Montagne d’Ambre 99.3% vs. JX205281
U. henkeli GA 1099 male Montagne d’Ambre 99.3% vs. JX205281
U. ebenaui (Boettger, 1879) FGMV 2205 female Manongarivo 99.4% vs. JX205278
U. ebenaui GA 1100 female NA 99.4% vs. JX205278
U. fiera Ratsoavina, Ranjanaharisoa, Glaw, Raselimanana, Miralles & Vences, 2015 FGMV 3097 male Fiherenana region 100% vs. JX205263
U. fiera GA 140 juvenile Fiherenana region 100% vs. JX205263
U. finiavana Ratsoavina, Louis Jr., Crottini, Randrianiaina, Glaw & Vences, 2011 FGMV 3084 male Montagne d’Ambre 100% vs. MW035835
U. finiavana GA 1100 juvenile Montagne d’Ambre 100% vs. MW035835
U. fimbriatus (Schneider, 1797) FGMV 2234 male NA 99.5% vs. AB612276
U. prope guentheri Mocquard, 1908 GA 328 male Marofandilia 96.8% vs. EU596688
U. prope guentheri GA 329 male Marofandilia 96.8% vs. EU596688
U. pietschmanni Böhle & Schönecker, 2004 FAZC 11627 male NosyBe 99.7% vs. EU596687