Table 4.
Model Fit and Parameter Estimates for Latent Growth of SIP-SD and Indirect Effect from Group Condition to Outcome Variables via ABS-POS
| Model Fit | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chi-square | χ2(30) = 26.56, p = .65 | |
| RMSEA | .00 | |
| CFI | 1.00 | |
| SRMR | .04 | |
| Statistic | Estimate (SE) | 95% CI |
| Intercept α | 64.18 (5.05)*** | [54.29, 74.07] |
| Slope β | −.71 (.42) | [−1.53, .11] |
| ABS-POS T1 | 3.63 (.09)*** | [3.46, 3.80] |
| Δ ABS-POS | 1.90 (.23)*** | [1.45, 2.36] |
| CBT vs. HE → α | 3.76 (1.97) | [−.10, 7.63] |
| CBT vs. HE → β | .06 (.16) | [−.26, .38] |
| RT vs. HE → α | 3.75 (1.88) | [.06, 7.44] |
| RT vs. HE → β | −.32 (.16)* | [−.63, −.01] |
| CBT vs. HE → ABS-POS T1 | −.37 (.12)** | [−.61, −.13] |
| RT vs. HE → ABS-POS T1 | −.29 (.12)* | [−.52, −.06] |
| CBT vs. HE → Δ ABS-POS | −.06 (.09) | [−.25, .12] |
| RT vs. HE → Δ ABS-POS | −.15 (.09) | [−.33, .03] |
| ABS-POS T1 → Δ ABS-POS | −.50 (.06)*** | [−.62, −.38] |
| Δ ABS-POS → β | −.65 (.33)* | [−1.29, −.01] |
| CBT vs. HE Indirect Effect | .04 (.06) | [−.08, .16] |
| RT vs. HE Indirect Effect | .10 (.09) | [−.05, .25] |
Note. SIP-SD = social disruption subscale of Sickness Impact Profile; ABS-POS = total positive affect subscale of Affect Balance Scale; CI = confidence interval; RMSEA = root-mean-square error of approximation; CFI = comparative fit index; SRMR = standardized root-mean-square residual; CBT = cognitive behavioral therapy; RT = relaxation therapy; HE = health education; α = intercept factor; β = slope factor; Unstandardized estimates (standard error) shown;
p < .05;
p < .01;
p < .001.