Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 4;34(16):7526–7542. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01938

Table 1. Formal Electrode Potentials (Peak Position Ep for Irreversible and E1/2 for Quasi-Reversible Processes (*), V, vs FeCp2), Onset Potentials (E, V, vs FeCp2), Peak-to-Peak Separation in Parentheses for Quasi-Reversible Processes (ΔEp in mV), EHOMO/ELUMO (eV) and Band Gap Values (ΔE, eV) for the Redox Changes Exhibited by Copper and Gold Complexesa.

  reduction
  oxidation
   
complex Efirst Eonset red ELUMO (eV) Efirst Eonset ox Esecond EHOMO (eV) ΔE (eV)
CMA1 –2.80* (166) –2.71 –2.68 +0.25 +0.14 –5.53 2.85
1 (Au) –2.79* (171) –2.68 –2.71 +0.55 +0.42 –5.81 3.10
2 (Cu) –2.99* (165) –2.89 –2.50 +0.40 +0.23 –5.62 3.12
3 –2.74* (173) –2.65 –2.74 +0.09 –0.04 –5.35 2.61
4 –2.66* (162) –2.58 –2.81 +0.22 +0.09 +0.63 –5.48 2.67
a

In THF solution, recorded using a glassy carbon electrode, concentration 1.4 mM, supporting electrolyte [nBu4N][PF6] (0.13 M), measured at 0.1 V s–1. EHOMO= −(Eonset ox Fc/Fc++ 5.39) eV; ELUMO= −(Eonset red Fc/Fc++ 5.39) eV.