Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 25;2022(8):CD013751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013751.pub2

Comparison 7. Subgroup analysis: frequency of administration (HIF versus ESA).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
7.1 Proportion reaching target haemoglobin 14 4601 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.93, 1.07]
7.1.1 Once a day 7 1315 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.88, 1.06]
7.1.2 Three times a week 7 3286 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.93, 1.12]
7.2 Thrombosis 11 17026 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.09 [0.86, 1.39]
7.2.1 Once daily 7 14532 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.71, 1.37]
7.2.2 Three times a week 4 2494 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.35 [0.99, 1.83]