Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 17;12(16):2114. doi: 10.3390/ani12162114

Table 1.

List of reviewed papers: study details, sample size, surgical planning, and meniscal injuries.

Authors Study Design GRADE N. Stifles Surgical Technique Measurement Technique Meniscal Tears at Surgery Meniscectomy Meniscal Release Late Meniscal Tears PTA Post Year
Lorenz et al. Case series Very Low 1 MMP - 1 - - - - 2014
Kapler et al. Retrospective study Very Low 38 MMP Orthomed and Modified Tibial Tuberosity Advancement Measurement Method - - - - 95.9° (86.7°–108.2°) 2015
Ness et al. Clinical trial Moderate 26 MMP Orthomed - NO NO - - 2016
Knebel et al. Prospective, randomised, controlled study High 35 MMP Orthomed 22 22 NO 2 - 2020
Terreros et al. Prospective clinical study Moderate 15 MMP Tibial Plateau Method 4 4 4 - 93.4° ± 2.1° 2020
Della Valle et al. Prospective clinical study Moderate 35 MMP Orthomed 27 27 6 0 89.7° ± 2.3° 2021
Serrani et al. Retrospective study Low 4 MMP - - NO NO NO 95.75° 2022
Etchepareborde et al. Retrospective study Very Low 20 MMT Transparency (Kyon) 8 8 NO 2 - 2011
Ramirez et al. Retrospective study Moderate 84 MMT Transparency (Kyon) 39 39 NO 3 - 2015
Marques et al. Case report Very Low 1 MMT Orthomed NO NO NO NO - 2017
Marques et al. Case series Very Low 2 MMT - NO NO NO NO - 2017
Lefebvre et al. Retrospective study Moderate 174 MMT - - - - - - 2017
Retallack et al. Retrospective clinical cohort study Moderate 35 MMT - 21 21 14 NO - 2017
De Barros et al. Prospective clinical study Very Low 21 MMT Software? - - - - - 2018
Valino-Cultelli et al. Prospective randomised study High 24 MMT Tibial Plateau Method - - - - - 2021
Valino-Cultelli et al. Prospective clinical study High 53 MMT Tibial Plateau Method - - - - - 2021
Serrani et al. Case series Low 1 MMT Tibial Plateau Method NO NO NO 1 83° 2022
Samoy et al. Prospective clinical study High 50 TTA Rapid Common tangent Method 21 21 29 0 - 2015
Arican et al. Prospective study High 17 TTA Rapid Template and Common tangent Method NO NO NO - - 2017
Butterworth et al. Retrospective study Moderate 152 TTA Rapid Tibial Axis Method 44 44 NO 9 - 2017
Dyall et al. Retrospective study Low 48 TTA Rapid Anatomical Landmark Method and Common tangent Method 19 19 NO 2 90.8° ± 2.9° 2017
Heremans et al. Case report Very Low 1 TTA Rapid - NO NO NO NO - 2017
Livet et al. Prospective randomised study High 13 TTA Rapid Long Axis Method 4 4 NO 2 91.1° (89.1–92.9°) 2019
Roydev et al. Retrospective study Low 10 TTA Rapid Common Tangent Method 5 5 5 1 - 2021
Serrani et al. Retrospective study Low 1 TTA Rapid - 1 1 NO NO 96° 2022
Trisciuzzi et al. Retrospective study Low 41 Porous TTA Common Tangent Method and Tibial Plateau Angle Inclination Method - - - - - 2019
Villavicencio et al. Prospective study High 65 Porous TTA Common Tangent Method - - - - - 2020
Mendeiros et al. Prospective clinical study High 42 mTTA Transparency - - - - - 2016
Morato et al. Prospective study High 16 mTTA - 5 5 - - - 2019
Serrani et al. Retrospective study Low 1 mTTA - NO NO - - 94° 2022
Zhalniarovich et al. Prospective study High 22 TTA CF Common Tangent Method 5 5 NO NO - 2018
Adamiak et al. Case report Very Low 2 TTA CF Common Tangent Method NO NO NO NO - 2018
Zhalniarovich et al. Case report Very Low 1 TTA CF - - - - - - 2019