Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 2;10(8):1866. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081866

Table 1.

Comparative analysis of confirmed and non-confirmed fusion structural and expression features.

Sample ID Fusion Type (5′-3′) ORF Preserved (Yes/No) 1 TK Domain Retained (Yes/No) 2 RTK on 5′/3′ End Presence in Fusion DBs 3 Greater RTK Downstream Reads (Yes/No) 4 Expr. of 5′/3′ Moieties 5 N Reads 6
Experimentally confirmed RTK fusions
AL-98 BCR-ABL1 Yes Yes 3′ Yes Yes 1.02/0.47 1
FS-1 CCDC6-RET Yes Yes 3′ Yes Yes 0.4/0.35 3
LuC-46 SLC34A2-ROS1 variant 1 Yes Yes 3′ Yes Yes 24.53/5.29 1
LuC-46 SLC34A2-ROS1 variant 2 Yes Yes 3′ Yes Yes 23.29/6.09 5
LuC-46 SLC34A2-ROS1 variant 3 Yes Yes 3′ Yes Yes 23.29/5.87 4
LuC-46 SLC34A2-ROS1 variant 4 No Yes 3′ Yes Yes 23.29/5.93 1
OC-11 FGFR2-LGSN Yes Yes 5′ No * ND 0.72/0.43 6
OC-11 RPS24-FGFR2 Yes No 3′ No No 5.74/0.29 5
BC-105 FBXL20-ERBB2 No Yes 3′ Yes Yes 1.28/11.77 18
BC-105 ATP2B1-ERBB2 Yes Yes 3′ No No 0.41/12.41 8
Experimentally non-confirmed RTK fusions
GC-30 ABL1-ALDH1A2 Yes No 5′ No ND 0.04/0.43 1
LuC-71 NTRK2-AL157886.1 No No 5′ No ND NA 1
LuC-11 KIF27-NTRK2 Yes Yes 3′ No No 0.02/0.67 1
LuC-19 NTRK2-USP47 No No 5′ No ND 0.83/0.24 1
LuC-81 ETNK1-NTRK2 No No 5′ No ND 0.22/6.36 1
XC-1 FGFR2-NFYC No No 5′ No ND 0.33/0.31 1
OC-15 ABL1-FNIP2 Yes No 5′ No ND 0.45/0.8 1
AL-44 FGFR1-AZIN1 No No 5′ No ND 0.15/0.6 1
AL-7 RET-GART No No 5′ No ND 0.016/0.48 1
J1 RBM18-ABL1 No No 3′ No No 1.94/1.9 1
A549 FGFR1-BRF1 Yes No 5′ No ND 1.21/0.52 1
SkC-1 ABL1-CD59 No No 5′ No ND 0.05/3.58 1
BC-59 FGFR1-REPS2 No No 5′ No ND 0.55/1.5 1
EpS-1 HMBOX1-FGFR1 No No 3′ No No 0.34/5.89 1
PC-24 DOCK1-FGFR2 Yes Yes 3′ No No 0.12/0.023 1
Overall specificity All confirmed vs. non-confirmed 0.67 0.87 NA 1 1 NA 1 (1/>1)
Overall sensitivity All confirmed vs. non-confirmed 0.8 0.9 NA 0.7 0.78 NA 0.7 (1/>1)
Putative RTK fusions that were not experimentally investigated by RT-PCR
TC-123 NTRK2-MLPH No No 5′ No ND 0.97/0.22 1
N-63 CNTNAP3-NTRK2 No No 3′ No Yes 0.88/0.24 8
RAIR-4 NCOA4-RET Yes Yes 3′ Yes Yes 0.69/0.11 1
TC-32 NTRK2-IARS1 Yes No 5′ No ND 2.55/0.74 1
TC-12 ARHGAP12-ALK No Yes 3′ No Yes 0.46/0.02 1
BT-24 NTRK2-ADAM32 Yes Yes 5′ No ND 0.23/0.006 1
BC-47 FGFR2-RET Yes Yes both No No 0.06/1.36 1
FFPE_4-2 ZNF135-FGFR2 Yes Yes 3′ No No 0.06/0.46 1
AL-84 AGRN-FGFR3 No Yes 3′ No Yes 0.82/0.17 1
FFPE-5 AC016907.2-ALK No Yes 3′ No No NA 1
INI-1 KIF5C-NTRK3 Yes No 3′ No Yes 1.17/0.19 1

1 Presence of preserved open reading frame. 2 Presence of preserved tyrosine kinase domain. 3 Presence of the chimeric transcript with the same fusion partners in ChimerDB (http://www.kobic.re.kr/chimerdb/ accessed on 21 June 2022), ChiTaRS (http://chitars.md.biu.ac.il/ accessed on 21 June 2022), and TumorFusions (https://tumorfusions.org/ accessed on 21 June 2022) databases (searched 15 June 2022). 4 Statistically significantly greater RTK RNAseq exon coverage downstream to the fusion site (t-test, p-value < 0.05 and/or the coverage of the exons downstream to the fusion site in sample with fusion was higher than 95th percentile of the same exons’ mean coverage in the control group, while the coverage of upstream exons was fitting within the 95% confidence interval (CI) of exon coverage level in samples without fusions), assessed only for the 3′RTK fusions; “ND” stands for the 5′RTK fusions. 5 Averaged expression levels of 5′- and 3′ fusion moieties calculated as RNAseq read counts normalized on lengths of exons. 6 Number of chimeric RNAseq reads. * FGFR2–LGSN transcript is absent from ChimerDB, ChiTaRS, and TumorFusions databases but was previously published in [32].