Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 10;14(16):3859. doi: 10.3390/cancers14163859

Table 1.

Patient characteristics of the training and the validation cohort.

Factor Training Validation p Value
N Rate N Rate
N 250 108
Histology
Adenocarcinoma 47 18.8% 18 16.7% 0.98
Squamous cell carcinoma 10 4.0% 4 3.7%
Others 15 6.0% 7 6.5%
None 178 71.2% 79 73.1%
Location
Central 39 15.6% 12 11.1% 0.26
Peripheral 211 84.4% 96 88.9%
Site
Right upper lobe 72 28.8% 40 37.0% 0.31
Right middle lobe 20 8.0% 7 6.5%
Right lower lobe 57 22.8% 21 19.4%
Left upper lobe 65 26.0% 20 18.5%
Left lower lobe 36 14.4% 20 18.5%
C/T ratio
≥50% 200 80.0% 89 82.4% 0.66
<50% 50 20.0% 19 17.6%
Maximum tumor diameter
Mean (mm) 20.5 20.8 0.85
SD 10.5 9.3
Age
Mean (y.o.) 77.1 77.8 0.47
SD 8.9 8.1
KPS
Mean (%) 89.0 88.5 0.52
SD 5.8 6.4
SUV-max
Mean 5.9 5.5 0.59
SD 5.1 4.2
Total radiation dose
Mean (Gy) 52.5 51.5 0.11
SD 4.6 7.6
Sex
Male 169 67.6% 76 70.4% 0.60
Female 81 32.4% 32 29.6%
RT technique
VMAT 171 68.4% 70 64.8% 0.23
Fixed multi-port 75 30.0% 33 30.6%
Both 4 1.6% 5 4.6%
Salvage treatment
Systemic therapy 15 6.0% 9 8.3% 0.45
Radiotherapy 9 3.6% 3 2.8%
Chemoradiotherapy 3 1.2% 0 0.0%
Surgery 3 1.2% 0 0.0%
Other treatment 2 0.8% 0 0.0%
None 29 11.6% 11 10.2%
Unknown 1 0.4% 3 2.8%
No recurrence 188 75.20% 82 75.9%

C/T―consolidation/tumor; KPS―Karnofsky performance status; SUV-max―maximum standard uptake value; RT―radiotherapy; VMAT―volumetric modulated arc therapy.