Table 2.
Study | Case definition | Representativeness of the cases | Selection of controls | Definition of controls | comparability | Ascertainment of exposure | Same method for ascertainment for both cases and controls | Non-response rate | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benito-Martin, 2013 (44) | * | * | * | * | * | 5 | |||
Shankhajit De, 2017 (45) | * | * | * | * | * | * | 6 | ||
Gudehithlu, 2015 (47) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 | |
Kalani, 2013 (36) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 8 | |
Sakurai, 2019 (46) | * | * | * | * | * | * | 6 | ||
Sun, 2012 (40) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | 7 | ||
Zubiri, 2015 (38) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 | |
Zuviri, 2014 (39) | * | * | * | * | * | * | 6 | ||
Kaminska, 2016 (13) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | 7 | ||
Luca Musante, 2015 (37) | * | * | * | * | * | 5 | |||
Wu, 2018 (41) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 | |
Wang, 2020 (42) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 | |
Chen, 2021 (43) | * | * | * | * | * | 5 |
*: The evaluation indicator had been conducted by the study.
**: In comparability section, if the most impartant factors were controlled then get *, if other second important factors were also controlled then get**