Table 1.
Comparison of various types of cell-free DNA.
Sr number | Properties | Circulating Tumor DNA | Cell-Free Fetal DNA | Cell-Free Mitochondrial DNA |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Strands | Single or double | Single or double | Double |
2 | Origin | Tumor cells | Trophoblastic cells [13] | Mitochondria or unknown [17] |
3 | Size | Less than 100 bp [18] | 200 bp with dominate peaks at 162 bp [19] | Shorter fragment = less than 1 kb; larger fragments = 21 kb [14] |
4 | Applications | Early cancer detection, mutation analysis, cancer prediction, noninvasive cancer detection | Prenatal testing, genetic disease detection in the fetus | Forensic sciences, detection of the geographical distribution of genes, gene flow identification, human remain recognition, cancer detection |
5 | Advantages | Sensitive than other cancer detection techniques, can detect mutations better than biopsy, detect heterogeneous tumor cells, predict cancer reoccurrence | Increased chances to detect chromosomal disorders, noninvasive, no side effects | Lacks genetic ambiguities, higher copy number, a diagnostic and prognostic marker for multiple diseases |
6 | Disadvantages | Cannot be detected by FISH or ICC techniques, expensive, lack standardization | Increased chances of false positives or false negatives | No heterogenicity, lower discrimination power |