Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 30;12(8):1840. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081840

Table 1.

Comparisons of labial alveolar bone between Ceph, U1CT, and U2CT.

Maxillary Teeth (n = 64) Labial Side
Ceph U1CT U2CT ANOVA p-Value Differences
(C) (U1) (U2) C-U1 C-U2 U1-U2
1) Alveolar bone thickness
3 mm apical to CEJ 0.81 ± 0.15 0.61 ± 0.12 0.57 ± 0.09 <0.001 0.20 ** 0.24 ** 0.04
6 mm apical to CEJ 0.95 ± 0.21 0.64 ± 0.11 0.59 ± 0.10 <0.001 0.31 ** 0.36 ** 0.05
9 mm apical to CEJ 1.32 ± 0.19 0.68 ± 0.11 0.65 ± 0.14 <0.001 0.64 ** 0.67 ** 0.03
2) Alveolar bone height (CEJ to alveolar crest) 1.38 ± 0.27 1.61 ± 0.20 1.65 ± 0.17 <0.001 0.23 ** 0.27 ** 0.04
3) Cortical bone thickness
3 mm apical to CEJ 0.81 ± 0.15 0.61 ± 0.12 0.57 ± 0.09 <0.001 0.20 ** 0.24 ** 0.04
6 mm apical to CEJ 0.95 ± 0.21 0.64 ± 0.11 0.59 ± 0.10 <0.001 0.31 ** 0.36 ** 0.05
9 mm apical to CEJ 1.32 ± 0.19 0.68 ± 0.11 0.65 ± 0.14 <0.001 0.64 ** 0.67 ** 0.03
4) Cortical bone height 10.51 ± 1.07 10.16 ± 0.96 10.04 ± 0.95 0.051 0.35 0.47 0.12
5) Cancellous bone thickness
3 mm apical to CEJ - - - N/A - - -
6 mm apical to CEJ - - - N/A - - -
9 mm apical to CEJ - - - N/A - - -

Differences between groups were tested by ANOVA and Bonferroni test. ** p < 0.001.