Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 30;12(8):1840. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081840

Table 3.

Comparisons of root diameters and total root-bone thickness between Ceph, U1CT, and U2CT.

Maxillary Teeth (n = 64) Ceph U1CT U2CT ANOVA p-Value Differences
(C) (U1) (U2) C-U1 C-U2 U1-U2
1) Root diameters
3 mm apical to CEJ 5.61 ± 0.68 6.07 ± 0.65 5.54 ± 0.60 <0.001 0.46 * 0.07 0.52 **
6 mm apical to CEJ 5.16 ± 0.55 5.68 ± 0.58 5.32 ± 0.80 <0.001 0.52 ** 0.16 0.36 *
9 mm apical to CEJ 4.64 ± 0.63 5.02 ± 0.63 4.85 ± 0.79 0.018 0.38 0.21 0.17
2) Total root-bone thickness
3 mm apical to CEJ 7.95 ± 0.81 7.80 ± 0.81 7.15 ± 0.60 <0.001 0.15 0.80 ** 0.65 **
6 mm apical to CEJ 8.35 ± 0.57 8.04 ± 0.77 7.57 ± 0.70 <0.001 0.31 0.78 ** 0.47 *
9 mm apical to CEJ 9.05 ± 0.75 8.25 ± 0.79 7.97 ± 0.91 <0.001 0.80 ** 1.08 ** 0.28

Differences between groups were tested by ANOVA and Bonferroni test. * p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001.