Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 12;11(16):2508. doi: 10.3390/cells11162508

Table 1.

Frequencies of changes of PAM pathway in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Gene
(Protein)
Alteration Effect on Signaling Correlation with Prognosis Frequency Reference
Luminal (ER+) HER2+ TNBC (ER−, PR−, HER2−)
A B
PTEN Inactivation and mutation/reduced expression over activation of PI3K signaling Negative in TNBC 29–44% 22% 67% [33,34,35]
PIK3CA
(p110α/PI3K)
Activating mutation Hyperactivation of PI3K signaling * Positive in luminal,
negative in metastatic/HER2+ breast cancer
47% 33% 23–39% 8–25% [33,36,37,38]
PIK3CB
(p110β/PI3K)
Amplification
/Mutation
PIP3 accumulates and activates AKT Irrelevant 5% [29,39]
PIK3R1
(p85α/PI3K)
Inactivating mutation Derepression of catalytic activity of p110α - 2% of Early breast cancer
11% of Metastatic breast cancer
[40,41]
AKT1 Activating mutation Hyperactivation of AKT Irrelevant 2.6–7.4% [33,42,43,44]
AKT2 Amplification Irrelevant 2.8–4% [18]
AKT3 Amplification Positive in luminal A breast cancer 15% [40]
PDK1 Amplification Hyperactivation of AKT - 20–38% [45]
(mTOR) p-mTOR expression Hyperactivation of mTOR Negative in TNBC 39% 37.5–72.1% [46]

* Positive: Associated with a better prognosis; Negative: Associated with a worse prognosis; Irrelevant: No significant correlation with prognosis; p-mTOR: phosphorylated mTOR.