Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 30;12(8):1846. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081846

Table 2.

Advantages and limitations of different imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiotoxicity.

Imaging Techniques Monitoring Index or Characteristic Advantages Limitations
MUGA LVEF Reproducibility Radiation exposure
Limited morphological and functional information of other cardiac chambers and extra-cardiac structures
Echocardiography LVEF
RVEF
Strain (GLS, GCS, GRS)
LV mass
Wide availability
High portability
No radiation
Morphological and functional information
Valvular function
Low cost
Suboptimal acoustic window
High operator dependency
High variability
GLS: inter-vendor variability and technical requirements
CMR LVEF
RVEF
Strain (GLS, GCS, GRS)
LV mass
Edema
Inflammation
Fibrosis
Reproducibility
Accuracy
No radiation
Morphological and functional information
Valvular function
Tissue characterization
Limited availability
High cost
Technical requirements
Patient adaptation (contraindications for CMR: difficulty in holding breath or lying flat)

MUGA = multi-gated radionuclide angiography; CMR = cardiovascular magnetic resonance; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; RVEF = right ventricular ejection fraction; GLS = global longitudinal strain; GCS = global circumferential strain; GRS = global radial strain.