Table 2.
Advantages and limitations of different imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiotoxicity.
Imaging Techniques | Monitoring Index or Characteristic | Advantages | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
MUGA | LVEF | Reproducibility | Radiation exposure Limited morphological and functional information of other cardiac chambers and extra-cardiac structures |
Echocardiography | LVEF RVEF Strain (GLS, GCS, GRS) LV mass |
Wide availability High portability No radiation Morphological and functional information Valvular function Low cost |
Suboptimal acoustic window High operator dependency High variability GLS: inter-vendor variability and technical requirements |
CMR | LVEF RVEF Strain (GLS, GCS, GRS) LV mass Edema Inflammation Fibrosis |
Reproducibility Accuracy No radiation Morphological and functional information Valvular function Tissue characterization |
Limited availability High cost Technical requirements Patient adaptation (contraindications for CMR: difficulty in holding breath or lying flat) |
MUGA = multi-gated radionuclide angiography; CMR = cardiovascular magnetic resonance; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; RVEF = right ventricular ejection fraction; GLS = global longitudinal strain; GCS = global circumferential strain; GRS = global radial strain.