Table 3.
Comparison of anomaly detection methods for different cases of data resolutions: high resolution corresponds to an alphabet size of 90, medium resolution corresponds to an alphabet size of 45, and low resolution corresponds to an alphabet size of 10. In this table, representation is used where is the mean and is the standard deviation. The proposed PDA method achieves overall best performance (bold entries of table).
Resolution | PDA | PDD | ZM | CDM | NNS | t-STIDE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROC AUC | Low |
0.948 ±0.011 |
0.930 ±0.013 |
0.943 ±0.014 |
0.787 ±0.017 |
0.901 ±0.027 |
0.725 ±0.025 |
Medium |
0.955 ±0.010 |
0.943 ±0.011 |
0.954 ±0.011 |
0.940 ±0.014 |
0.918 ±0.022 |
0.881 ±0.017 |
|
High |
0.963 ±0.009 |
0.959 ±0.009 |
0.959 ±0.009 |
0.957 ±0.012 |
0.920 ±0.021 |
0.897 ±0.013 |
|
PR AUC | Low |
0.876 ±0.050 |
0.871 ±0.052 |
0.826 ±0.071 |
0.669 ±0.067 |
0.719 ±0.098 |
0.678 ±0.067 |
Medium |
0.885 ±0.046 |
0.882 ±0.047 |
0.881 ±0.053 |
0.880 ±0.060 |
0.777 ±0.093 |
0.828 ±0.050 |
|
High |
0.909 ±0.044 |
0.907 ±0.044 |
0.895 ± 0.044 |
0.907 ±0.057 |
0.777 ±0.091 |
0.857 ±0.044 |