Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 20;11(16):2516. doi: 10.3390/foods11162516

Table 1.

Aroma-active compounds in wild lowbush blueberry fruit from the provinces of Nova Scotia (NS), Prince Edward Island (PE), New Brunswick (NB) and Quebec (QC) identified through gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) and ranked by average modified frequency (MF) values 1.

Compound RI MF Value (%) Aroma Descriptors 2 ID Basis 3
NS PE NB QC Ave
Ethyl 2-methylbutanoate/3-Hexanone 1052 70.6 56.6 79.2 74.0 70.1 Fruity (30) 4, Sweet (30), Blueberry (17), Floral (10), Citrus (4) RI, Std, AD, MS/ RI, Std, AD, MS
Methyl 2-methylbutanoate 1012 72.1 59.6 73.0 67.1 68.0 Sweet (32), Fruity (21), Blueberry (15), Floral (12), Caramel (8) RI, Std, AD, MS
Methyl 3-methylbutanoate 1022 64.5 60.3 49.3 66.1 60.1 Fruity (15), Sweet (14), Rancid-cheesy (12), Pungent, sharp (10), Blueberry (8) RI, Std, AD, MS
Ethyl 3-methylbutanoate 1066 48.1 43.7 58.4 54.2 51.1 Fruity (19), Sweet (18), Blueberry (11), Floral (9), Herb-like (3), Pungent-sharp (3), Rancid-cheesy (3) RI, Std, AD, MS
Ethyl propanoate 951 53.7 47.3 49.9 55.1 51.5 Citrus (13), Green-grassy (11), Sweet (8), Chemical (6), Fruity (6), Floral (6) RI, Std, AD, MS
(E)-2-Hexen-1-ol 1401 57.5 39.5 44.7 61.1 50.7 Rancid-cheesy (19), Sulfury (13), Earthy-musty (9), Pungent-sharp (8), Roasted-nutty (8) RI, Std, AD, MS
(Z)-3-Hexen-1-ol 1378 52.5 46.9 52.3 47.3 49.8 Green-grassy (18), Rancid-cheesy (10), Earthy-musty (9), Herb-like (8), Sweet (5) RI, Std, AD, MS
1-Octen-3-one/Methyl 2-pentenoate 5 1303 64.5 30.1 51.6 49.9 49.0 Earthy-musty (18), Rancid-cheesy (9), Herb-like (9), Pungent-sharp (8), Fruity (5) RI, Std, AD, MS/ RI, AD, MS
2-Dodecanone 1719 48.4 48.4 42.9 54.2 48.5 Floral (16), Fruity (10), Herb-like (10), Citrus (10), Sweet (9) RI, Std, AD, MS
Ethyl 2-methylpropanoate 970 51.4 29.4 49.5 60.2 47.6 Sweet (23), Fruity (15), Floral (8), Citrus (6), Blueberry (4) RI, Std, AD, MS
Linalool 1531 51.4 36.9 46.5 47.3 45.5 Floral (22), Sweet (19), Fruity (11), Herb-like (6), Blueberry (6) RI, Std, AD, MS
Geraniol 1827 63.2 0.0 45.0 65.4 43.4 Floral (18), Sweet (10), Citrus (6), Fruity (5), Blueberry (5) RI, Std, AD, MS
2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 1504 44.2 23.1 35.8 59.9 40.7 Sweet (11), Floral (10), Herb-like (10), Citrus (9), Green-grassy (8) RI, Std, AD, MS
Unknown 786 786 40.0 29.7 39.0 46.2 38.7 Rancid-cheesy (18), Earthy-musty (8), Pungent-sharp (4), Blueberry (3), Floral (3), Herb-like (3)
(E)-2-Hexenal 1226 20.7 51.4 21.9 48.4 35.6 Floral (10), Sweet (7), Fruity (5), Green-grassy (4), Herb-like (4), Roasted-nutty (4) RI, Std, AD, MS
1-Penten-3-one 1031 25.3 37.9 27.1 46.2 34.1 Rancid-cheesy (9), Earthy-musty (5), Floral (3), Green-grass (3), Herb-like (3), Pungent-sharp (3) RI, Std, AD, MS
Hexanal 1087 32.7 31.0 20.7 48.1 33.1 Green-grassy (20), Herb-like (6), Blueberry (2), Earthy-musty (2), Roasted-nutty (2), Fruity (2) RI, Std, AD, MS
1-Pentanol 1245 32.7 30.6 21.9 47.1 33.1 Citrus (4), Roasted-nutty (3), Fruity (3), Rancid-cheesy (3), Pungent-sharp (3), Floral (3) RI, Std, AD, MS
Methyl 3-methyl-2-butenoate 1175 38.6 24.2 25.3 37.9 31.5 Sweet (12), Fruity (11), Herb-like (5), Blueberry (3), Floral (3), Caramel (3) RI, Std, AD, MS
1-Hexanol 1345 33.5 23.1 28.3 37.4 30.6 Fruity (11), Sweet (10), Floral (4), Blueberry (4), Carmel (2) RI, Std, AD, MS
(Z)-3-Hexenal 1149 25.8 37.4 27.1 30.6 30.2 Green-grassy (13), Herb-like (6), Rancid-cheesy (4), Fruity (3), Floral (3) RI, Std, AD, MS
3-Heptanone 1152 23.1 0.0 49.4 35.8 27.1 Green-grassy (14), Earthy-musty (7), Floral (4), Herb-like (3), Fruity (2), Roasted-nutty (2) RI, Std, AD, MS
(E)-2-Nonenal 1541 42.2 31.0 0.0 34.6 26.9 Earthy-musty (8), Roasted-nutty (6), Rancid-cheesy (5), Sweet (4), Fruity (3) RI, Std, AD, MS

1 Values for each province are the average of fifteen GC-O analyses conducted on fruit from three commercial lowbush fields by five evaluators for each sample. Compounds presented had average MF values > 25%. 2 The five most frequent descriptors. 3 RI, retention index; Std, standard; AD aroma description; MS mass spectrum (See Table 2 for RI reference comparisons and MS similarity values). 4 Frequency of descriptor chosen by GC-O panelists. 5 Tentative identification.